Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Strzok, security clearance or not? WHO IS LYING?
The Washington Times and Today's Testimony ^ | June 22, 2018 | Larry O'Connor

Posted on 07/12/2018 2:42:15 PM PDT by Hostage

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: billyboy15
As was mentioned here there are different levels of security clearance.i t is probable Stream lost his TS clearance and only has a limited access clearance commonly held by clerks. He was relieved of his duties and reportedly has no real responsibilities at this time.

If that is the case, then Sessions(lol) should have said that Strzok lost his TS level of clearance but he still has his Secret level of clearance. Sessions didn't say that.

And Strzok shouldn't even have a Secret level clearance nor should he still be employed at the DOJ.

21 posted on 07/12/2018 3:14:41 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon

“more importantly that Huber has NOT impaneled a grand jury to investigate this corruption against Pres Trump.”

I’ve been saying this for months. If people actually READ the letters to Grassley that Sessions sent, it absolutely does NOT state Huber has been given ANY prosecutorial authority over the misdeeds from the Obama administration.

The “Huber will save us!” chant is pure bs. It. Ain’t. Happening. See tagline.


22 posted on 07/12/2018 3:15:26 PM PDT by Basket_of_Deplorables ("Trust Sessions" is not a plan. It is subversion of Trump by useful idiots. Fire the DOJ 3 stooges!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

I believe I heard that his clearance was stripped but reinstated for this hearing so he could review papers in preparation. I mean reinstated on a limited basis.


23 posted on 07/12/2018 3:17:23 PM PDT by pbear8 (the Lord is my light and my salvation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GnuThere

Strzok sneers and smirks. His attitude is demonic.

Are we still giving him a paycheck?


24 posted on 07/12/2018 3:17:31 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Strzoke’s lawyer?

Perhaps he was escorted out the door, but nobody says that he was fired. And he apparently still has a clearance.


25 posted on 07/12/2018 3:20:28 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pbear8

Good point. That’s certainly a possibility.

But I think it should not involve a security clearance, rather a conditional authorization for him and his attorney to review. Because his attorney would need such a clearance as well and I am fairly sure it is not done that way.


26 posted on 07/12/2018 3:23:08 PM PDT by Hostage (Article V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: abclily

His facial responses tell all. To think this person was charged with protecting us. Looks like a little kid with his nah nah I got you antics


27 posted on 07/12/2018 3:27:37 PM PDT by patriotspride
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!

Unfair to Fleetwood Mac...and that’s a good album!


28 posted on 07/12/2018 3:29:33 PM PDT by mac_truck (aide toi et dieu t'aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15
Yes, I believe he is very, very, comfortable today.

He has no worries about his clearance, his job, or his legal jeopardy.

With good reason.

He is being protected by President's Trump's justice dept.

29 posted on 07/12/2018 3:30:55 PM PDT by roses of sharon ("Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: patriotspride

Exactly! He thinks he is in charge of the room.


30 posted on 07/12/2018 3:35:52 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Strozk didn’t have a security clearance while he was doing many of his evil deeds. That is because he failed his Poly. He was given a security clearance retroactively (don’t know how that is possible). Most likely so all the people that gave him classified info didn’t go down with him. Probably many were underlings that didn’t know. He was most likely escorted out for multiple reasons, one of which was that most likely his clearance was stripped.


31 posted on 07/12/2018 3:55:51 PM PDT by Revolutionary ("Praise the Lord and Pass the Ammunition!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

There are different levels of security clearances. Maybe his was lowered, say, from Top Secret to Secret.


32 posted on 07/12/2018 4:56:08 PM PDT by jch10 (Somebody has got to do something.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jch10
Maybe his was lowered, say, from Top Secret to Secret.

I'd like it lowered to him reading meters and writing parking tickets in Chicago or Baltimore.

33 posted on 07/12/2018 4:58:46 PM PDT by corlorde
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jch10

he said he had top secret clearance with something else..


34 posted on 07/12/2018 5:06:08 PM PDT by rolling_stone (Hang em high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jch10

he said he had top secret clearance with something else..


35 posted on 07/12/2018 5:06:08 PM PDT by rolling_stone (Hang em high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

they announced his title muky muk somethng of human resources..apparently same pay grade as before..


36 posted on 07/12/2018 5:07:41 PM PDT by rolling_stone (Hang em high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Sessions said “Mr. Strzok, as I understand, has lost his security clearance.”

As you understand, eh Jeff? I guess your boss, Rosenstein, doesn't exactly keep you in the loop on much these days.

Go back to sleep, you useless potted plant.

37 posted on 07/12/2018 5:37:50 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign

deputy assistant director of the human resources division of the fbi.....


38 posted on 07/12/2018 6:12:15 PM PDT by rolling_stone (Hang em high)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Revolutionary
Strozk didn’t have a security clearance while he was doing many of his evil deeds. That is because he failed his Poly. He was given a security clearance retroactively (don’t know how that is possible). Most likely so all the people that gave him classified info didn’t go down with him.

Polygraph is a tool in doing initial clearances and evaluating employees of various departments at regular intervals. The rules for DOD, DOJ and say, NASA are not totally uniform for employment purposes however there are standards for certain programs such as SAP.

Having built SAPF areas for DOD branches prior to retirement I got a general impression of the clearance processes from off hand impressions. Many people "fail" or don't have a "clear" polygraph and interviews and fine tuning generally make "Passing" a polygraph not a yea or nay thing in determining if a person gets various levels of security clearance.

39 posted on 07/12/2018 6:25:34 PM PDT by KC Burke (If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

He may have retained only a generic Top Secret, without access to compartmented information, or access to certain levels of briefings or building space. Even at the Department of State a TS is a requirement to be hired; and when your spouse gets a job another TS is granted. A TS at State is like a Secret clearance for a Sergeant or 2LT in the Army. State’s TS clearances have 5 levels prominently displayed on your ID Badge to show your access.... Glad I’m done!


40 posted on 07/12/2018 7:37:28 PM PDT by Jumper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson