NOTHING you have said has looked at, analyzed or spoken on what the author said. You need to get a grip. Rejecting anything our of hand, without letting your mind objectively consider it is just dumb, reactionary and defensive, like a child - “no mommie I won’t look at it, I won’t digest it, I won’t judge it on it’s own, I don’t like anything from anyone I don’t know”.
I have zero personal stake in an author whom I do not even know. If I have any stake it is in rejecting Freepers who reject something out of hand instead of examining it objectively on their own. It is such Freepers more than an anonymous writer on the Federalist society whom I would not trust.
Wuli, I’m sorry you don’t have the tools to grasp this, but I want to know everything that determines the value of the information I review. You can waltz around the subject all you like, but it matters to me who put together the information.
There are people who worked in the Bush White House I consider to be enemies of our nation.
If you think this society is above that sort of thing, you aren’t playing with a full deck.
Now you can refer to me not being honest, or adult like, or toss in any other insult your tiny little mind can come up with, I’m not buying in.
I’ve told you this over and over. It’s not going to change.
I believe I already told you it’s fine with me if you want to buy off on it. So go ahead.
When I know who offered up the information, I’ll consider it.
Until then you can toss all the hissy fits you want.
If a man won’t stand behind what he has aired in public, why should I?
And if I won’t stand behind it until I know who offered it up, I’m not going to bother paying attention to it.