That “personality” issue goes both ways.
Shouldn’t we be able to know who it is making these accusations? What baggage did they bring to the issue? Where were they on Monday morning?
Do you realize that there are two sides to every argument, and sometimes people do make judgements seemingly against our beliefs, but for good cause in the overall scheme of things. What if Kavanaugh noticed a broad interpretation of a case might actually hurt our cause long term, despite seeming like a good thing at the moment?
You are making what if suppositions, but unlike the author you bring no case or case analysis to YOUR argument, as they do theirs. Which is the unbiased objective observer supposed to consider more? Yours, merely because your name is on it?