Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

ultimately, the best measure of Kavenaugh’s worth is how much the leftist hate him. WaPoo’s whining is a pretty good start ...


4 posted on 07/09/2018 7:30:50 PM PDT by catnipman ((Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: catnipman
Not this time!

They were going ti hate and attack ANYONE, far worse than they did Bork, no matter WHO it was. If Trump had picked a far lefty, they would have called him or her a NAZI and KKKer.

29 posted on 07/09/2018 7:47:57 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

“ultimately, the best measure of Kavenaugh’s worth is how much the leftist hate him. WaPoo’s whining is a pretty good start ...”

i am highly suspicious. i don’t think the rhetoric of the Washpost is not strong enough to indicate any real reservations about this pick. i hope i am wrong.


46 posted on 07/09/2018 8:02:37 PM PDT by IWONDR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman

Yes. Who gives damn what the Wash Post thinks (and I use the word “think” loosely).

They had no problem endorsing Ruth Bader Ginsburg, as far left a justice as ever has sat on the SC. Her record is exactly parallel to that of the Communist Party on many of their positions. Paint her Red.

Kagan - OK for a lib but not my preference re any judicial balance in her though processes.

Breyer- far-left loon.

The Wash. Post didn’t oppose Sotomayor for her “racist” comment about being a “proud Latino woman” instead of saying “a proud American woman”.

Talk about hypocrisy. It is alive and well at the Wash. Post, and for those of us who read it during the Vietnam War (and Cambodia/Laos wars), we know that you secretly favored the North Vietnamese communists because you never opposed their naked and covert aggression throughout SE Asia including Thailand.

Nor did you oppose their genocidal extermination policies after the war ended, costing an estimated 2-2.5 MILLION lives plus the imprisonment and torture of hundreds of thousands, if not more than a million, who survived their slave labor camps.

The Washington Post has as much blood on its hands and writings as had the New York Times denying (or refusing to cover), the Ukrainian Famine/Holomador genocide and the Holocaust of European Jews, Gypsies (esp. the Roma), homosexuals, the White Rose resistance group, anti-Nazi Christians, Poles and political prisoners.

The Washington Post can never “wash” away the bloodstains, journalist lies and propaganda, and biases that have been their hallmarks since the 1960’s.


65 posted on 07/09/2018 10:24:12 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: catnipman
ultimately, the best measure of Kavenaugh’s worth is how much the leftist hate him. WaPoo’s whining is a pretty good start ...

It's nowhere near panicked enough.

I'm troubled.

77 posted on 07/10/2018 8:03:23 AM PDT by Lazamataz (The New York Times is so openly dishonest, even their crossword puzzles lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson