He claims he and fellow staff knew nothing of this. So, easy-enough, what do the fellow staff say? If all say they knew nothing of this at the time, that would collaborate his claim. What else can we do? The timing is suspect, the messenger is suspect, but the claims are too easily believed in light of Penn State and Speaker Hastert. Let’s see how Jordan deals with it. I figure if others collaborate his explanation and no lies are discovered, this is gone with the next news cycle.
fair enough. My approach is the accused gets the benefit of the doubt. In all cases.