Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tennessee Nana

True but that is a technicality, all but 8 were born in the Colonies. Of those 8 this LIBTARD alludes to, 2 were born in England, the other 6 were born in FORCED SUBJUGATED ENGLISH Countries of Ireland, Scotland and Wales. And only history buffs would know their names.

Bing coughs up good info.


61 posted on 07/06/2018 7:13:16 AM PDT by GailA (Ret. SCPO Wife: suck it up buttercups it's President Donald Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: GailA

Yes Gail but as far as the English Crown was concerned they were born on English soil...

so they were British...

Plus if you check their ancestry ...fathers were English born living in those countries...Wales was part of England The Prince of Wales title stems from around 1100...Scotland had been fully under the English crown and law for more than 100 years ...since 1764 the “Scots” by law could not speak their native tongues only English and were forbidden to wear their tartans...and Ireland and her bogs had been subdued ...but these would have been “Englishmen”...they never stopped being “English” even if the family had lived in Ireland for several generations...

All 56 were English...equally subjects of the English Crown...born English...of English parents...no immigration necessary...


65 posted on 07/06/2018 7:33:58 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson