except her adoptions weren’t American kids
which makes her look like she adopted them for virtue signaling or political purposes, whether or not that is the case
either way, it’s evidence that she will choose non-American over American - she made that choice for incredibly important decisions in her own life - and should be considered unacceptable to us as a result
loyal American conservatives who will uphold the law is what we want here, and if there is ANY question about any of these on those counts, strike them from the list
I don’t think 7 kids in the house is virtue signaling. It’s a hard job.
There are several good reasons to go abroad for adoption. Virtue signaling isn't one of them. Parental age and long waiting lists are a problem in the U.S. Underlying that is the fact that we kill most of our unwanted children and slip many of the remaining easily adoptable kids through private adoption programs where money talks. Too many of the children who are available are special needs kids, are older, and/or have spent years in unsatisfactory foster care situations. And then there is the insanity of the U.S. legal system, with demon crackhead moms waiting in the wings to reengage as soon as they get out of the slammer. Going this route is called "buying a problem." It can be a lot simpler and safer to just go abroad, and get a clean, final adoption of a healthy infant with no nightmarish strings attached.
I GENERALLY agree with you But I just don’t trust her not turning on us years down the road because my gut tells me that anyone that would “choose” to have SEVEN kids in todays world and then want to have an 80 hour a week job is NUTS !!!
If we gotta have ANOTHER woman find me a Maggie Thatcher or Sarah Palin or Jeanne Kirkpatrick type.