Posted on 07/01/2018 9:03:59 AM PDT by House Atreides
There has been a lot of discussion on the possibility of Trump selecting Judge Barrett as his nominee for the current SCOTUS vacancy. Surprisingly (to me anyhow) there has been a lot of opposition to her expressed here by FReepers with a significant portion because she is a woman and thus viewed as prone to “evolve”. Many FReepers who I know to be women are among those opposed to her because of the view that women Justices are subject to this “evolving”.
Others oppose her because of concern that they don’t know much about her. If you go to the linked site, you may learn some more about her and help fill in some gaps.
Well the Pope seem to miss out on a great deal of “belongs” to.
Thank you very much! I will read that, all the more now that it looks like it’s down to her and one other person.
Yes.....in some respects, Hardiman appeals more to me....he grew up pretty darn scrabble. His dad drove a taxi and he earned a scholarship to ND. Academic scholarships to Notre Dame back then were really hard to find. Now, today...not too tough if you’re the right kind of kid.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.