THAT is a very deceptive title. It implies that Zuckerberg himself ACTIVELY sought for membership.
We already know how deceptive the MSM are. Forbes ought to be better than that.
Agreed! People need to read this article, Zuckerberg is NOT really a member of NAMBLA.
Agreed. It’s click bait. Forbes isn’t what it used to be since they sold it to some fuzzy foreigners.
We already know how deceptive the MSM are. Forbes ought to be better than that.
..................
You mean Facebook ought to be better than that. It’s on their webpage. Forbes did a great service and if you can’t see the forest through the trees regarding this specific instance then go sell your whine somewhere else.
The article is also poorly constructed.
‘Bad, had journalist.’
“””Blogger Michael Arrington seems to have already performed a helpful proof-of-concept by adding Mark Zuckerberg to a group supposedly representing NAMBLA, the North American Man-Boy Love Association. Zuckerberg’s addition to the group is broadcast to all of his friends, as shown in the image above.”””
Zuck IS a member of nambla since the blogger signed him up, so technically, the title is true. Zuck just didn’t sign himself up, someone else did it for him. That’s the whole problem outlined in the article.