Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP candidate: Civil war wasn’t about slavery
The Hill ^ | June 25th, 2018 | Lisa Hagen

Posted on 06/25/2018 3:28:41 PM PDT by Mariner

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 781-799 next last
To: GailA
It seems like lot of people on Free Republic see no problem in putting Gen Lee in a burka.


361 posted on 06/26/2018 6:54:57 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: central_va

How many?


362 posted on 06/26/2018 6:57:13 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: central_va

Memphis took down Gen Nathan Bedford Forest statue and other Confederate ones. State ruled it illegal, they don’t care, that it was a double grave site. All they left were the pedestal and graves, and that was vandalized with spray paint.

Memphis is 1 of those NO GO UNARMED CITIES.


363 posted on 06/26/2018 7:09:52 AM PDT by GailA (Ret. SCPO Wife: suck it up buttercups it's President Donald Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies]

To: George Rand

“The north had been moving to an industrialized economy while the south had been content with selling high priced cotton to England and France.”

One thing that history teaches us, is that nations fall because they fail to adapt to changing technologies and refuse to modernize. In this case, the South could have industrialized, but elected not to industrialize.

“So, to answer your question, the South couldn’t support their war effort because the North, rather strategically, rushed to capture Southern transportation systems for over-seas sales.”

History also teaches us that if a nation at war is so weak that it is unable to secure its transportation systems, that nation loses their war.


364 posted on 06/26/2018 7:09:56 AM PDT by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“First thing Lincoln did was to throw up a blockade that would stop trade between the South and Europe.”

That’s a proven war time strategy.


365 posted on 06/26/2018 7:15:11 AM PDT by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519; fieldmarshaldj; Impy
>> We all have to make choices. When Stewart drops out, you hopefully you get a decent replacement. <<

Unfortunately I seriously doubt Stewart will drop out. Most likely we will getting Todd Akin redux, where his useful idiot fan club rallies around him and insists that ANY replacement is a "RINO" so only the current candidate is acceptable. Then their guy goes down in flames in November against a marxist RAT.

Hope I'm wrong.

366 posted on 06/26/2018 7:24:12 AM PDT by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 352 | View Replies]

To: central_va; Impy
>> So stay out of VA politics. If Stewart drops out I will not be voting.... <<

Ironically, Stewart is a born and bred Minnesotan, so he's one of those "damnyankee transplants who moves down here and tells us how we should run our state" that you guys are always complaining about.

I kinda wish he had "stayed out of VA politics". But since he didn't, the marxist Democrat will be re-election without breaking a sweat thanks to Stewart's crappy campaign.

367 posted on 06/26/2018 7:30:29 AM PDT by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: central_va; Impy
>> So stay out of VA politics. If Stewart drops out I will not be voting.... <<

Ironically, Stewart is a born and bred Minnesotan, so he's one of those "damnyankee transplants who moves down here and tells us how we should run our state" that you guys are always complaining about.

I kinda wish he had "stayed out of VA politics". But since he didn't, the marxist Democrat will be re-elected without breaking a sweat thanks to Stewart's crappy campaign.

368 posted on 06/26/2018 7:31:44 AM PDT by BillyBoy (States rights is NOT a suicide pact.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 340 | View Replies]

To: Bull Snipe

You are correct on the dredging and the construction of light houses, I think the post roads were a wash though (If I recall correctly.)

The tariff of 1828 should answer your question. We’re talking about nearly a 40% tax on imported goods! The Souths economy was almost fully fueled by the sale of cotton and other material to France, England, Spain, and in return the import of cheaper goods. The Northern states sought this tariff in order to force the purchasing of materials and products from northern industries.

So did congress appropriate federal money to subsidize northern industry? Absolutely.
Railroads, roadways, canals - there were undoubtedly southern tax dollars used to build these. Remember this is the same tariff which led to the nullification crisis which I argue was the beginning of the Civil War.

Now it can be argued, well wait, didn’t the federal government sell land grants to get money to build the transcontinental railroad? Yes, they did. But there were lines built before this, and they were funded by taxes and private enterprise.

In fairness, I have spent quite a substantial amount of time looking for legislation passed by congress to appropriate federal funds to subsidize the northern industries but I can’t find any appropriation bills that I can access during that time at all. I can find rough amounts during that meeting of congress but I cannot find delegated amounts and what for. The latest I can find with that much detail is 1998. Therefore I cannot answer your final question, yet.

I must stress again that I acknowledge that slavery was a component of the Civil War, I just don’t believe it was the driving factor.


369 posted on 06/26/2018 7:46:31 AM PDT by George Rand (-- I can't befriend liberals because I won't befriend ignorance --)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
“The most conservative men I know from the World War II generation have almost to a man told me that they believe the Civil War had little to do with slavery”

Apparently they knew nothing about US History.

Allow me to repair your "edited" quote.

"The most conservative men I know from the World War II generation have almost to a man told me that they believe the Civil War had little to do with slavery and everything to do with Abraham Lincoln being a lousy federalist totalitarian."

And give you some advice. Guys like you who make a living being know-it-alls on the internet should avoid slandering WWII veteran American heroes who are personal friends and mentors of mine. I'd blow up ten thousand of you to save one of them for one more day.

370 posted on 06/26/2018 7:57:14 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 229 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham

“Some say the ice caps are melting and that polar bears will soon be extinct.”

You are placing Lincoln in the ranks of kooks.


371 posted on 06/26/2018 8:02:40 AM PDT by jeffersondem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Those “conservative” men were just wrong and they believed a myth. A conservative defends the Union and its constitution.

To any end?!? Lincoln was a totalitarian federalist bully and the beneficial side-effect of the war being that slavery was abolished was the PR campaign that he jumped on.

The first state that has the guts to secede from this unholy union will be the one I move to.

I put my God fearing hand over my heart every time I recite The Pledge Of Allegiance, but I never utter the word "indivisible" while doing so.

372 posted on 06/26/2018 8:05:12 AM PDT by MarineBrat (Better dead than red!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: George Rand

Thanks.

“didn’t the federal government sell land grants to get money to build the transcontinental railroad? Yes, they did. But there were lines built before this, and they were funded by taxes and private enterprise”.

The Government gave the Union Pacific and Central Pacific Federal land for the Transcontinental railroad. In addition to the right of way, each railroad received title to every other section on both sides of the right of way. Do not believe any direct Federal appropriation for funds went to either rail road. Since the 1840s the Government had granted federal land to railroads for their right of ways.
This was available to Southern railroads, just as it was to Northern railroads. The standard method of financing railroad construction in both the North and the South was for the company building the railroad to sell stock in the venture or issue bonds for the funds needed for construction. Prior to the war the Federal Government did not give money to railroads unless it was for hauling Government cargo. During the war, the USMRR built railroads, bridges, trestles and repaired damaged tracks. But this was strictly a wartime endevor


373 posted on 06/26/2018 8:33:14 AM PDT by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: MarineBrat

Interesting. The Marines I know are smarter than that.


374 posted on 06/26/2018 9:00:48 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: sargon
LOL! Absolutely ludicrous. Making a flippant (or even reasoned) assertion like that will never make it true.

The evidence supports it. The South produced between 73% and 84% of all European money, goods and services imported into the United States. US law (among others, the Navigation act of 1817) caused those imports to arrive in New York instead of the areas in the South where the trade goods were produced to pay for them.

As all of Washington DC's income came from taxing imports, 73-84% of that tax money depended upon those Southern exports. When the European trade shifted south to Norfolk, Charleston, Mobil and New Orleans, that 200 million dollars per year in 1860 trade value was going to move to those ports, and New York (and the Washington tax collectors in New York) were going to be deprived of that money.

For one thing, in the buildup to the Civil War, there was an animated national debate over whether any State even had the right to secede from the Union.

One would think that they could look "four score and seven years" into the past for the valid answer to that question.

Your other points are worthy of further reply, but I think these two points to which I responded deserve superior consideration to any other remaining points.

375 posted on 06/26/2018 9:30:24 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
BTW the word “slavery” is not in the Constitution

No it isn't, because they were too ashamed to admit it, and so they used euphemistic terminology to describe the same thing.

much less “enshrined” in it.

And there you are wrong. Despite their refusal to use the word, they described the same meaning accurately enough to discern they were specifically referring to slavery. They just couched it in less offensive descriptive language.

Article IV, section 2.

376 posted on 06/26/2018 9:35:03 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You can’t enshrine something you can’t even say aloud. That’s just (typically) idiotic of you.


377 posted on 06/26/2018 9:47:45 AM PDT by rockrr ( Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: central_va
BS. Times are changing. Stewart is going to win.

Times may be changing but Virginia isn't. Enjoy your Senator Kaine.

378 posted on 06/26/2018 9:53:04 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

I just listened to him

You sure learn how prevalent this is in GOPe groupthink

Rush has always been GOP grinder monkey

He never ever totally calls them out like ironically another south basher Levin does

I won’t listen to him for a while I’m sure he’ll be fine

I’m 24/7 I’ll write the show when I have time he should at least get feedback

I’ll even be polite


379 posted on 06/26/2018 10:06:50 AM PDT by wardaddy (Hanged not hung.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 274 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
There was two sovereignties involved here. There was no conditional ratification, no right to revoke and no right to seize federal property. This was settled in a letter from Madison to Hamilton during the NY state ratification convention. NY was holding out for the right to leave and Madison held that it was unacceptable. What would be sufficient grounds to leave, just about anything?

Oh right. A random letter from one person to another tells us exactly how the Constitution says no secession. Because correspondence between citizens has force of supreme law. And yes, anything is sufficient grounds. Per the DoI, all political power is inherent in the people. If a state's populace want to leave the Union simply because, they have every right to do so. And no right to revoke? There are plenty of treaties that are broken or not adhered to. Why would a treaty of annexation be automatically permanent, yet no other treaty is?

The Articles of Confederation were superseded by the “more perfect union” of the federation.

Oh, were they now. Those same Articles of Confederation that didn't 'allow' for secession either? How did the states get out of these? Oh - they simply said that they no longer apply.
380 posted on 06/26/2018 10:16:49 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 781-799 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson