See post #41 for an explanation. From #41:
In most cases, refusal of service is warranted where a customer’s presence in the restaurant detracts from the safety, welfare, and well-being of other patrons and the restaurant itself.
All she has to say in court is that her rabid leftist clientele might riot if they knew a Trump supporter was in the restaurant.
I support her right to throw Sanders out, and I support a conservative restaurant owner's right to throw Democrats out. In both cases, the restaurant owners should have to live with the consequences. In this particular case, I hope she is run out of business.
I also think that, in general, public accommodations laws should be modified to apply ONLY in cases of true emergency.
If this is adjudicated and the court buys this as a valid defense, the precedent will be earth shattering. Imagine telling ferals at dennys, ihop, Mcds, waffle hs they will not be served because their presence detracts from the safety of the restaurant and others.