[redcatcherb412]

In most cases, refusal of service is warranted where a customer’s presence in the restaurant detracts from the safety, welfare, and well-being of other patrons and the restaurant itself.

If this is adjudicated and the court buys this as a valid defense, the precedent will be earth shattering. Imagine telling ferals at dennys, ihop, Mcds, waffle hs they will not be served because their presence detracts from the safety of the restaurant and others.

[TChad]

If this is adjudicated and the court buys this as a valid defense, the precedent will be earth shattering.

Good point. So far I have not located the original source for that quote from #41.

I should not have included it in my post.