To: Magnatron
Hansen, how come the the actual temperatures are not what the models predicted?
24 posted on
06/18/2018 6:56:48 AM PDT by
Right Wing Assault
(Kill: google,TWITR,FACEBK,WaPo,Hollywd,CNN,NFL,BLM,CAIR,Antifa,SPLC,ESPN,NPR,NBA)
To: Right Wing Assault
this is also when the researchers found the monitors were set up by a/c exhaust ports on roof tops and on parking lot asphalt areas, or next to geysers at Yellowstone not to mention none below the equator or on ocean buoys, with all the resources of NASA an the weather service the sensors should be every where. Deliberate fraud by culpable politicians on a to big to fail premise.
42 posted on
06/18/2018 7:41:58 AM PDT by
bdfromlv
(Leavenworth hard time)
To: Right Wing Assault
More importantly, your graphic refers to "model(s)"
If the "models" are accurate, they would ALL agree, and there would only be a single model needed.
48 posted on
06/18/2018 8:02:27 AM PDT by
Sgt_Schultze
(When your business model depends on slave labor, you're always going to need more slaves.)
To: Right Wing Assault
Yep. I distinctly remember reading an article - back in 1999 - in USA Today, about how Florida would be completely underwater - along with most other coastal cities - by 2016.
Not even close.
FR had an interesting piece the other day about how the oceans would rise .6mm / year due to global warming/cooling/change/whatever. Lotsa hype and hyperbole, we're all going to die, etc etc etc.
.6mm/yr is 60mm/century. Or a little over 2 inches, in 100 years.
I'm not sweating it.
51 posted on
06/18/2018 8:24:03 AM PDT by
wbill
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson