Posted on 06/17/2018 10:35:45 AM PDT by Mariner
Delegates at the Republican Party of Texas convention on Saturday voted to approve platform planks endorsing marijuana decriminalization, medical cannabis and industrial hemp. They are also calling for a change in cannabis's classification by the federal government.
"We support a change in the law to make it a civil, and not a criminal, offense for legal adults only to possess one ounce or less of marijuana for personal use, punishable by a fine of up to $100, but without jail time," reads one of the party's new positions.
"Congress should remove cannabis from the list of Schedule 1," says another.
A third asks lawmakers to expand an existing state law that provides patients with limited access to low-THC medical cannabis extracts so that doctors can "determine the appropriate use of cannabis to certified patients."
And a fourth says industrial hemp is a "a valuable agricultural commodity."
That the official GOP organ in a red state like Texas would voice support for such far-reaching cannabis reforms is the latest sign of how mainstream marijuana has become in American politics.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
“doped-up truckers?”
It used to be much worse than what is likely to happen with legal weed-when I was s teen living on the ranch, many small ranchers-including one of my uncles-owned rigs and worked as long-haul truckers for their main source of income. All the teens knew whose dad, older brother, etc who was un trailero kept a bottle of mollies or other speed capsules, so they could get high and keep truckin’ for a couple days without sleep-talk about dangerous... They would also often take phenobarb to come down when they got to their destination, and crash for 24 hours before picking up their next load and paperwork, hitting the road-and the pills-to do it all again.
Most of those pills were legally prescribed and obtained from a doc-just like the f***ing opiates are now-with that going on, legal weed looks like a goddamn nursery school picnic to me...
I even saw it as a workers comp case manager as late as 2003, when regulations for long haul truckers were tightened-the only difference was that now the truckers were staying wired on cowboy cocaine-aka crystal meth, which is unbelievably addictive and health-destroying...
The facts from Colorado:
“(5) minimal increase in tax revenue, probably offset by costs for police, increased traffic deaths, people poisoning themselves and needing increased medical costs,”
Colorado tax revenues from marijuana:
2014 $67,594,323
2015 $130,411,173
2016 $193,604,810
2017 $247,368,473
2018 $109,002,969 (Jan-May)
https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/revenue/colorado-marijuana-tax-data
.
‘Taint no fun if its legal!
.
“skyrocketing usage in general”
Out of the ludicrous pile of bullshit you just dropped, I had to single this one out for comment and rebuttal.
In Colorado teen and pre-teen use has GONE DOWN since legalization, and adult use remains constant. Of course, official use data shows it going up as they are comparing the “medical marijuana” construct to the “legal marijuana” construct.
Anyone who believes there’s a bunch of people in Colorado smoking pot after legalization that were not smoking it before...is deluded by their emotions.
Legalization does not increase the use of a drug that was ubiquitous prior to legalization.
And it’s ubiquitous in most states in the union. Which is one of the reasons over 60% of the American public supports full legalization.
So will you adopt a doper or not?
“Homocide is certainly not equivalent to illegal drug use, but laws against either one are “prohibitions”, which you seemed determined to eliminate.”
That’s a silly conflation that could only be the product of a simple and weak mind.
If you don’t have the horsepower to understand the context of the statement, you’d do well to shut up and quit looking stupid.
Of corse I do but yanking your chain pays well.
[OMITTED BY ITSAHOOT: Anyone who before legalization was responsible enough to not use illegal marijuana will after legalization remain responsible enough to not become a bill-creater.] I don't like being stuck with the bill for trying to enforce the War on Pot, nor the bills for the additional destruction created by the War on Pot's putting profits in criminal hands.
So will you adopt a doper or not?
Addressed in the text you omitted.
Will you be passing the hat for for trying to enforce the War on Pot, and for the additional destruction created by the War on Pot's putting profits in criminal hands?
No, they don't - the "gateway effect" is purely a fabrication of prohibitionists.
The context of my statement was your incorrect claim that psychologists and psychiatrists say marijuana is a "gateway drug."
And yes, your are right I have never used cannabis. I also have never had a beaker of cyanide, but I do know it 'might' be a bad choice.
Here’s what your War on Drugs did to these children =>
______
“Mass search of Georgia high school students included genital touching ...”
June 06, 2017
a) Deputies ordered students to stand facing the wall with their hands and legs spread wide apart;
b) Deputies touched and manipulated students breasts and genitals;
c) Deputies inserted fingers inside girls bras, and pulled up girls bras, touching and partially exposing their bare breasts;
d) Deputies touched girls underwear by placing hands inside the waistbands of their pants or reaching up their dresses;
e) Deputies touched girls vaginal areas through their underwear;
f) Deputies cupped or groped boys genitals and touched their buttocks through their pants.
This is shocking, at least at first glance. But perhaps it shouldnt be. If police believe the drug war gives them authorization to conduct anal and vaginal cavity searches, forced enemas, and colonoscopies based on little more than a police officers suspicion that someone is hiding some quantity of illegal drugs, allegations of a little over-the-clothes groping of high school students ought not surprise us in the least.
According to the lawsuit, the deputies had a list of 13 suspected students. Three of them were in school that day. For that, they searched 900 students. (And, lets just point out again, found nothing. In a school of 900.)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3559602/posts
______
It makes you wonder how many children have been molested in the name of your War on Drugs, doesn’t it?
What the heck???? Are they freaking morons??? Did not anyone live through the 60’s, 70’s and early 80’s and see the destruction that drugs brought??
Were drugs legal then? If not, those days tell us nothing about the wisdom of legalizing.
If you think our current laws are preventing anyone from using marijuana, you’re sadly mistaken. The only thing those laws are doing, is creating the conditions for a criminal black market to thrive.
End the prohibition and that market (and its attendant criminality) goes away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.