The IG stated there were no documents or testimony regarding evidence of political bias. He did not say there wasn't political bias. There is a big difference. If the FBI and DOJ hide such evidence, of course he doesn't have it.
The IG said there was an appearance of bias and raised questions about the objectivity of the investigation.
There is enough here, along with other evidence to demand a special counsel to prosecute these individuals
Exactly.
No link?
He actually is saying no evidence the Hilary decision was based on bias. He did find bias, just not a witness or document saying that this bias was behind the decision. HOWEVER I’d say when you write that you will Stop Trump, your bias affected the decision on Hillary.
“Words are important”
I agree, but the title of your vanity uses a double negative. Let’s not start doing mental gymnastics here.
Yes, and the local news is reporting that there was no bias.
The fact is that this government is controlled by a bunch of corrupt bastards. There will be no justice and they can pretty much do what ever they want.
This will dominate the MSM reporting and, as you point out, it will be distorted to convince the clueless that the IG found “no political bias”.
The real story is that both the MSM and the FBI have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted. As for the Democrat Party, they are clearly an Organized Criminal Enterprise.
You are completely correct. Now would be a good time for OUR President to release the unredacted version.
They will begin to scurry now because the next report is about TREASON.
The IG stated there were no documents or testimony regarding evidence of political bias.
Sometimes I hate semantics.
Somebody tell Rush.
He was livid about 2:35 pm.
Agree.
I was just looking over pages xi and xii and the report writers address what is at minimum the appearance of political bias in Strzok and Page.
The IG isn’t a prosecutor. They aren’t going to use the language of a prosecutor. They are providing the information that a prosecutor may use to prosecute. That may be what Huber and other federal prosecutors are working on right now.
I just finished reading the Executive summary of the OIG report. I thought it was intended to be a white wash. . . throwing a few executives under the bus, but basically saying everything with Clinton and Obama were copacetic and they did nothing wrong. The bias in the OIG report is literally dripping off the page. . .
The IG misses the irony about finding FBI agents and employees using personal phones and devices as completely inappropriate for transmitting confidential FBI documents yet gives Hillary a complete pass on her use of her personal server AFTER finding all the confidential and secret documents on Anthony Weiner’s laptop, certainly proving the worst case scenario that her use of non-secure communications HAD COMPROMISED SECURITY of STATE DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS which wound up where they were NOT SUPPOSED TO BE!
Talk about willful blindness and talking out of both sides of the IG’s word processor.
The 18-month Inspector General review of the DOJ/FBI investigation of the Hillary Clinton email has been released – OIG RELEASE LINK HERE
This IG inquiry is specifically looking into whether the FBI investigation was corrupted by political influence in their determination of the Clinton outcome. The IG report provides background on the overall issues, the potential crimes; the subsequent coverup; and the corruption that infested the 2016 Department of Justice and the FBI.
Important note. Read, but don’t focus on, the “executive summary” or “conclusions”; those two sections were written by political administrators in FBI and DOJ leadership. Focus on the substance of the documented facts within the IG report. You’ll note the specific facts don’t support the “summary/conclusion”.
Analysis will follow.
If George Bush had compiled half the conspiracy to thwart 0bama’s election, when 0bama won, he would have attempted to execute everyone for treason. Trust me.
See the Persian harpy for reference.
5.56mm
The gloom and doom faction doesn’t care.
The IG Report is like a CNN report it’s not what they report it’s what they don’t report.
That is just what Turley said on Fox.
Need the details on page 294. “Crimes against children” white washed to look like it’s Wiener, and not information on HRC or any video.
I want the un-redacted report and not the report Rosenstein glossed over facts.