Posted on 06/14/2018 12:25:58 PM PDT by WASCWatch
The IG stated there were no documents or testimony regarding evidence of political bias. He did not say there wasn't political bias. There is a big difference. If the FBI and DOJ hide such evidence, of course he doesn't have it.
The IG said there was an appearance of bias and raised questions about the objectivity of the investigation.
There is enough here, along with other evidence to demand a special counsel to prosecute these individuals
Exactly.
No link?
He actually is saying no evidence the Hilary decision was based on bias. He did find bias, just not a witness or document saying that this bias was behind the decision. HOWEVER I’d say when you write that you will Stop Trump, your bias affected the decision on Hillary.
“Words are important”
I agree, but the title of your vanity uses a double negative. Let’s not start doing mental gymnastics here.
Yes, and the local news is reporting that there was no bias.
The fact is that this government is controlled by a bunch of corrupt bastards. There will be no justice and they can pretty much do what ever they want.
This will dominate the MSM reporting and, as you point out, it will be distorted to convince the clueless that the IG found “no political bias”.
The real story is that both the MSM and the FBI have demonstrated that they cannot be trusted. As for the Democrat Party, they are clearly an Organized Criminal Enterprise.
You are completely correct. Now would be a good time for OUR President to release the unredacted version.
They will begin to scurry now because the next report is about TREASON.
The IG stated there were no documents or testimony regarding evidence of political bias.
Sometimes I hate semantics.
Somebody tell Rush.
He was livid about 2:35 pm.
The point of the poster's post, and its headline wording, is to refute the message of the few hours this afternoon from the MSM that "there was no political bias" in the IG report. The double-negative is important to the meaning.
Media: "There was was no political bias."
Poster: "The report did not say there was no political bias."
Agree.
I was just looking over pages xi and xii and the report writers address what is at minimum the appearance of political bias in Strzok and Page.
The IG isn’t a prosecutor. They aren’t going to use the language of a prosecutor. They are providing the information that a prosecutor may use to prosecute. That may be what Huber and other federal prosecutors are working on right now.
The “no bias” was used in regards to Comey only as far as I can see. It isn’t used in regard to Strzok and Page.
You can bet the RATs are doing a victory dance.
And they should.
This was a predetermined and planned whitewash.
Those who think otherwise are delutional.
And if it can proven to be a whitewash which it will. There is new law which went into effect Monday that is going to spell lots of trouble for those involved. A new entity to law enforcement is officially empowered to deal with this and they are not the beaureaucrats friend. I was trained on it yesterday and it’s officia.
I don’t think the redactions would change the IG’s conclusion that some agents texts could lead to the “appearance” of bias and that better training is necessary to prevent the “appearance” of bias because it could “cast a cloud” over an investigation. The next report will be the same.
What law?
It is a new law concerning the use and release of official government information that is encompassing over all entities. The oversight is no longer DOJ’s alone. They have a watchman now who can investigate, prosecute and punish them. It looks to me that Trump was way ahead of them. It became official on Monday.
I just finished reading the Executive summary of the OIG report. I thought it was intended to be a white wash. . . throwing a few executives under the bus, but basically saying everything with Clinton and Obama were copacetic and they did nothing wrong. The bias in the OIG report is literally dripping off the page. . .
The IG misses the irony about finding FBI agents and employees using personal phones and devices as completely inappropriate for transmitting confidential FBI documents yet gives Hillary a complete pass on her use of her personal server AFTER finding all the confidential and secret documents on Anthony Weiner’s laptop, certainly proving the worst case scenario that her use of non-secure communications HAD COMPROMISED SECURITY of STATE DEPARTMENT DOCUMENTS which wound up where they were NOT SUPPOSED TO BE!
Talk about willful blindness and talking out of both sides of the IG’s word processor.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.