Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alberta's Child
There's one problem with your scenario: If Sessions was really a "Trojan horse," then he would have been more effective if he DIDN'T recuse himself.

Not true. Sessions takes himself to the side, selects Rosenstein, then the two of them recommend Comey be fired. Rosenstein even documents all the reasons in a letter. Then when the president does exactly what they recommend, Comey and Rosenstein arrange for Mueller's investigation. In the meantime, Sessions remains a roadblock to cleaning out the whole mess. Sessions could not have been more effective in tying the president's hands regarding the Justice Department that supposedly reports to Trump in any other way except how it all played out.

If you sincerely believe that he would have been more effective if he didn't recuse himself, explain how.

32 posted on 06/10/2018 11:17:38 AM PDT by Avalon Memories ( Proud Deplorable. Proud born-in-the-USA American Dreamer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Avalon Memories

If his goal was to undermine Trump, then he would have maintained more control over the process if he had stayed involved. Because he recused himself, we now have a situation where Mueller is making himself look like a complete fool every time one of the cases he prosecutes has a court hearing.


36 posted on 06/10/2018 12:21:55 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson