Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Political Junkie Too

He’s not even being charged with that (which is a non-existent offense anyway), but with trying to contact a “witness” (I think it was before he even knew the person was a witness, judging by the dates).

In other words, like all the other things, it’s a “process crime,” which is now used by the FBI and the DOJ to get somebody on something just so they can say they did.

I’m no fan of Manafort, but this is ridiculous. As you point out, he was hired for a specific job with no relationship to Russia, foreign policy or anything outside of party politics, but they’re determined to destroy anybody who had anything to do with Trump.


18 posted on 06/06/2018 2:24:11 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: livius
Could Manafort claim ex post facto if he spoke to someone before they were considered a witness? Did Mueller find out that Manafort spoke to someone and then declared that person to be a potential witness?

Manafort knows everyone who is anyone, so he'd have to become a hermit to avoid any risk. I know he was on house arrest while awaiting trial, so Mueller is trying to up the pressure by revoking his bail and jailing him. I would assume that a judge told Manafort to avoid contact with people who were involved as a condition of his bail, but what are the practical limits of that when Mueller has such an open-ended mandate?

-PJ

32 posted on 06/06/2018 2:52:09 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson