Posted on 05/26/2018 12:33:41 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
The "Clapper Defense" to perjury.
The way they are ‘proving this to be true’ is THEY planted the evidence and ‘dirtied up’ Trump & Co from the start.
the Progressives are eating this up. When they lose this fall (and I mean LOSE) they will up the ante. this is getting interesting...
We will win this one.
Clapper's perjury when ask about NSA spying: YouTube
Clapper's lie about the perjury: YouTube
He told Megan McCain on ‘The View’ that he didn’t lie he answered the wrong question.
Megan MCCain asked, “What you’re referencing though ... when you’re talking about James Snowden blowing the whistle on the NSA illegally spying. And in 2013 when you were asked about it, you said no, so that is a lie.”
“No, it isn’t a lie. I’m sorry. It isn’t a lie. I was thinking about something else, another program. I can get into the technical details. He was asking about the metadata program and the euphemistic way he asked about it, I didn’t break the code,” Clapper said.
Brennan and Clapper are in panic mode based upon their actions and broad comments of this past week. They see that it is all unraveling and are trying to smokescreen to cover their boss.
However, Valerie Jarret and the little gay boy are becoming very obviously the director-originators of the whole mess.
Wyden: "Give me a yes or no answer to the question: Does the NSA collect any type of data at all on millions or hundreds of millions of Americans?" [See video in post-103]
Isnt that called libel?
John Clarence Woods was a United States Army master sergeant who, with Joseph Malta, carried out the Nuremberg executions of ten former top leaders of the Third Reich on October 16, 1946, after they were sentenced to death at the Nuremberg Trials.
well if they don’t have a sealed indictment within 5 years, the statute of limitations will have expired and he is off scott free..
Regrettably, almost half the country. They want it to be true, so if what he says is what they want to hear, then they believe him.
of course not however the question remains since he apparently lied under oath has he been indicted before the statute ran out and if not indicted why not? no reasonable prosecuter?
Sessions was not recused from this, was he?
That’s a sad truth. But if conservatives can be publicly hounded for unprovable rumors from decades ago, why should Clapper ever escape the same treatment from conservatives for this?
it should be shoved in his face every time he opens his mouth and tells more lies on tv or anywhere. CNN hires liars should be a headline.
https://saraacarter.com/this-is-cnn-hiring-of-suspected-leaker-clapper-raises-ethical-questions/
Agreed
He is delusional.
Voters don’t just flip because someone is posting the truth about Hillary Rotten Clinton on their facebook page and twitter. All of her scandals were known about for years, and no one found out 2 weeks before the election.
Many of the ‘flipped’ voters were men and women who had lost their jobs during the obama fiasco and weren’t willing to vote for H-> .. who would continue the same policies.
My Dad was a Bronze Star Master Sergeant in the Judge Advocates Corp in the Battle of the Bulge area — Colrain Pocket.
He could have tied that knot.
Clapper must be undone—Trump should focus all of his resources to get to the Truth about him.
A proven liar doubling down.
Prison sentence for Direct Lying To the Ameerican people while in an official capacity (obstruction of justice/selling his office/conspiracy to commit treason, and lots more).
Good grief this clown is a conniving liar. It’s FAKE Clapper, and you know it’s FAKE. Yet now you are trying the Dan Rather defense of FAKE but REAL.
Clapper is worried he is going to prison soon. Hence, why he is making the case, but it’s true even though the “dossier” is fake.
Save that for your GITMO judge Clapper you lying P.O.S.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.