Posted on 05/21/2018 11:56:15 AM PDT by Kaslin
Oh, what a tangled web we weave... when first we practice to deceive.”
This quote is attributed to Sir Walter Scott, a Scottish historian and novelist. Too bad he wasn’t available for a sermon at the royal wedding this past weekend, rather than social justice preacher Bishop Michael Curry. The House of Windsor certainly wove a tangled web over the decades.
The Deep State has been weaving its own tangled web of Russian collusion for the past two years beginning with Russia supposedly hacking the 2016 election, creating the electoral outcome they desired. It has since morphed into Trump colluding with the Russians, despite zero proof on the one-year anniversary of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s free-for-all investigation by his merry band of partisan Democrats.
It’s now to the point that Mueller’s team is investigating anyone in Trump’s circle who ever ate a bowl of borscht or drank a sip of Russian vodka. At a time when this couldn’t get any more ridiculous, look no further than the Washington Post for a version of “can you top this?”
A few days ago, the WaPo published an opinion piece entitled, “The FBI didn’t use an informant to go after Trump. They used one to protect him.”
Sure, they did. I can’t wait to read from the WaPo how Iran wants nukes to “protect” Israel or that that sanctuary cities are for the “protection” of legal, law-abiding residents of those cities.
The Trump piece was written by Asha Rangappa, a former FBI agent and Yale graduate. That’s two strikes against her already. The Clintons are Yale graduates and James Comey is a former FBI agent. I rest my case.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
“It was a video”
Sure they were....and Lee Harvey Oswald was trying to protect the motorcade by taking out snipers on the Grassy Knoll when he sneezed 3 times and “accidentally” hit Connelly and Kennedy.
If they were trying to protect him, then why didnt they inform him of this protection?
Whats there to hide?
Once Trump was GOP the candidate he received national security briefings. Total BS here not to tell him of course.
Like:
“Nice campaign ya got there. Be a shame if somethin’ happened to it.”
That kind of protection?
This is a like a defense lawyer claiming that his client didn’t rape a woman, but rather protected the plaintiff from others who might rape her.
“Your honor, my client was simply placing his penis in the plaintiff’s vagina in order to prevent others from doing so.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.