Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Houston police chief: We need people to start using the ballot box to take action on gun control
The Hill ^ | 05/20/18 | Julia Manchester

Posted on 05/20/2018 10:08:50 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo said on Sunday that voters need to use the ballot box to achieve change on gun control in the wake of the deadly shooting at a Santa Fe high school last week.

"People at the state level and the federal level in too many places in our country are not doing anything other than offering prayers," Acevedo told CBS's Margaret Brennan on "Face the Nation."

"We need to start using the ballot box and ballot initiatives to take the matters out of the hands of people that are doing nothing that are elected into the hands of the people to see that the will of the people in this country is actually carried out," he added.

Acevedo aired his frustrations on Facebook on Saturday over the Santa Fe shooting.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; donutwatch; guncontrol; houston; police; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

1 posted on 05/20/2018 10:08:50 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

B careful what ya wish for Chief


2 posted on 05/20/2018 10:09:33 AM PDT by CGASMIA68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Yeh because it’s just too much trouble to put a metal detector and armed guard on the door.


3 posted on 05/20/2018 10:10:49 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It should be no surprise to anyone that the Houston police chief came over from Austin.


4 posted on 05/20/2018 10:11:16 AM PDT by rhinohunter (Dear Mr. Trump: I'm still not tired of winning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
elected into the hands of the people to see that the will of the people in this country is actually carried out," he added.

Funny, according to recent polls, the will of the people is against gun control, putz.

5 posted on 05/20/2018 10:12:27 AM PDT by Right Brother
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
You keep saying "the will of the people". I do not think it means what you think it means.


6 posted on 05/20/2018 10:12:48 AM PDT by Teacher317 (We have now sunk to a depth at which restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Well then Chief, this must mean electing persons who want to implement solutions that are proven to effectively deal with the criminal and tragic misuse of firearms but fully respect the rights of the law abiding.


7 posted on 05/20/2018 10:13:17 AM PDT by OttawaFreeper ("The Gardens was founded by men-sportsmen-who fought for their country" Conn Smythe, 1966)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

[[Houston Police Chief Art Acevedo said on Sunday that voters need to use the ballot box to achieve change on gun control in the wake of the deadly shooting at a Santa Fe high school last week.]]

So now the ballot box determines which inalienable rights we get to keep?

How about if we said “We need use the ballot box to curb people’s first amendment rights’?


8 posted on 05/20/2018 10:14:00 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Ah, so the public can vote to invalidate the Bill of Rights!?

In that case, the public needs to vote to restrict the media-enemy.


9 posted on 05/20/2018 10:14:24 AM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Beat me by :24!


10 posted on 05/20/2018 10:15:24 AM PDT by Darteaus94025 (Can't have a Liberal without a Lie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

[[elected into the hands of the people to see that the will of the people in this country is actually carried out,” he added.]]

The ‘will of the people’ is to have constitutional protections to our INALIENABLE RIGHTS


11 posted on 05/20/2018 10:15:33 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
You keep saying "the will of the people". I do not think it means what you think it means.

Don't kid yourself.

Get an assault weapons ban on the ballot as a referendum and it would pass in a landslide. Every minivan-driving soccer mom would vote for it.

12 posted on 05/20/2018 10:15:44 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
How about if we said “We need use the ballot box to curb people’s first amendment rights’?

The 1st Amendment is under the same assault as the 2nd is. Put a "hate speech" ban on the ballot right next to an assault weapons ban and don't be shocked when they both pass by landslides.

Constitutional? That's up for debate but in the meantime, the new laws will stand until some judge says differently.

13 posted on 05/20/2018 10:18:29 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Start by voting YOU out.


14 posted on 05/20/2018 10:19:30 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

Universal suffrage seems a whole lot less appealing now.


15 posted on 05/20/2018 10:20:23 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The first act of gun control should be to Protect our Public Servants and Public Employee’s

It shall be a Felony punishable by 20 years in prison for ANY Public Employee or Public Servant to have any person in their employ or employed on their behalf for security or prot3ection of Any kind while in possession of any weapon, firearm or ammunition.

YOU FIRST CHIEF!!!


16 posted on 05/20/2018 10:25:00 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434
The irony is a public official should act to keep a person's
unalienable rights even when a person says they don't want that right.

The official should act in the person's best interest and keeping those
unalienable rights is best for them, even if they don't realize it.

17 posted on 05/20/2018 10:25:52 AM PDT by philman_36 (Pride breakfasted with plenty, dined with poverty and supped with infamy. Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Drew68

IIRC, most states have laws which prohibit local governments from passing ordinances that are stricter than state law.

I’m Paul Revere on the following: newly passed GVRO/Red Flag laws now allow anyone to denounce a gun owner to police as being a danger to others. The police obtain a GVRO and knock on the owner’s door and his guns are gone.

Oversimplified? Due process followed in all cases? Google GVRO and learn. Potential for abuse is enormous.


18 posted on 05/20/2018 10:28:24 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam. Buy ammo.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: T-Bird45
Universal suffrage seems a whole lot less appealing now.

Honestly, I'm surprised they didn't think of gun bans via ballot initiatives years ago.

19 posted on 05/20/2018 10:28:52 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970
IIRC, most states have laws which prohibit local governments from passing ordinances that are stricter than state law.

That doesn't stop them. They'll pass the laws and then the state governments will have to fight to overturn them. And if the state elected officials agree with the new local ordinances, they're not going to fight very hard.

Case in point, wait and see how much effort Colorado's Statehouse puts in fighting Boulder's new assault weapon ban.

20 posted on 05/20/2018 10:32:47 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson