1. If a U.S. Attorney is going to convene a grand jury in this case to consider criminal charges against crooked DOJ/FBI officials, is there any jurisdiction where a grand jury is more likely to return indictments than Utah?
2. After Donald Trump was inaugurated in January 2017, nearly all of the sitting U.S. Attorneys were asked to submit their letters of resignation (a few who were close to retirement were permitted to stay for a few more months). This is a routine process when a new administration takes over. One of the U.S. Attorneys submitted a resignation letter but it wasn't accepted (that would be Rod Rosenstein of the District of Maryland). Another one submitted a resignation letter that was accepted, but he was immediately re-appointed to replace himself (that would be John Huber of the District of Utah).
Do you think any of this is a coincidence?
It would be fabulous if the case could be heard in Utah. Sadly, there is nothing to suggest any nexus with Utah that would make it a proper venue.
“1. If a U.S. Attorney is going to convene a grand jury in this case to consider criminal charges against crooked DOJ/FBI officials, is there any jurisdiction where a grand jury is more likely to return indictments than Utah?”
If a US Attorney is going to convene a grand jury to consider criminal charges against crooked DOJ/FBI officials, that grand jury would necessarily need to be convened in the district where the crimes were committed, otherwise the grand jury would have no jurisdiction over them. Do you think senior DOJ/FBI officials were flying out to Utah to have their secret conspiracy meetings or something?
2. After Donald Trump was inaugurated in January 2017, nearly all of the sitting U.S. Attorneys were asked to submit their letters of resignation (a few who were close to retirement were permitted to stay for a few more months). This is a routine process when a new administration takes over. One of the U.S. Attorneys submitted a resignation letter but it wasn't accepted (that would be Rod Rosenstein of the District of Maryland). Another one submitted a resignation letter that was accepted, but he was immediately re-appointed to replace himself (that would be John Huber of the District of Utah).
Do you think any of this is a coincidence?
____________
Thank you for the wisdom.
This is THE most important component of the Huber involvement. In the DC market, the jury pool would be from DC, northern VA and MD. Those areas are relexively democrat at nearly 80%. It's why democrat inaugurals are so populated - an overwhelming supply of supporters who can take a half-hour bus or train ride, plus so many are government employees and have the day off.
There is simply no way they would convict or even consider returning indictments against these prominent "resistance members." America's best chance at resolving this is to keep it out of democrat strongholds.