IG cannot indict.
This should be in “breaking”
Who is “Huber”? Some Deep State shovel-and-shut-up artist I presume?
Pretty much every human working inside the Beltway right now is the target of an investigation.
If a Gigantic Story breaks and the Network ignore it, does it make a sound?
The bet is: active base or passive base. The line is clear.
“Sources are saying the report on the FBI’s 7th floor under Comey’s Directorship is absolutely damning and “worse than expected.”
Horowitz report isn’t finalized yet; lawyers for the various people in the report are currently reviewing the report and preparing rebuttals.
Story developing…”
Hold off and wait for the report, “sources”
Obama and his commissars turned the once respected FBI into a Soviet style secret police agency to do the dirty work of its political masters. Same can be said of the entire Department of Justice, IRS, CIA and the NSA. The military was neutered. However long it takes, however hard the swamp resists and painful it is, Obama, Lynch, Comey, Brennan and the rest must be brought to justice and held accountable. There can be no other conclusion that Obama tried to rig a Presidential election and subverted democracy.
They targeted Flynn because he blew the whistle on the Obama gang covering up how strong ISIS was and the fact that the Obama admin used ISIS as a strategic asset.
They should all rot in jail.
Another Story the big three Networks will Ignore.
"reasonable grounds for believing"
Lots of wiggle room there, IG Horowitz.
Thanks for playing.
I’m just glad someone said it out loud.
What is there to believe or not believe?
She had classified information on her server.
THAT IS THE CRIME RIGHT THERE.
Doens’t require intent.
Doesn’t require an explanation for how it got there.
Doesn’t require an explanation for where it might have come from.
Doesn’t require an explanation for where it was supposed to go.
All by itself, the presence of that info on her server, under her control (since she established it) is the crime; the perp; the evidence; the closing argument; the applicable Federal code; and the sentencing guideline.
All in one. No study, no argument, no equivocation, no coin flip, no shading the meaning. It is self defining exactly as it sits.
The Storm is Coming!
So, has the IG report been released or is Paul Sperry, whoever that is, pulling this ‘info’ out of his arse?
BOOM
At this point in time, with only that sliver of information about that one conclusion by Horowitz, there are two possibilities for this one issue.
1) The violations of law contributed to the incorrect conclusion that Hillary Clinton and others should not be charged. and that she and others need to be charged now.
2) The violations of law did not contribute to Comey’s conclusion that Hillary Clinton and others should not be charges, and that they should not be charged even now.
3) Horowitz believes that whoever is in charge of the DOJ should flip a coin and then not do much of anything except make grand speeches about what they intend to do, because intent is the most important factor.
Of course not. State Dept and CIA won't be covered by DOJ/OIG.
Now, why are those who are subject of the report allowed to see it and prepare rebuttals before it is even released?
Specifically, to whom will Horowitz's report be addressed? The AG? Anyone know for sure?