Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Memo to Trump: Defy Mueller
Townhall.com ^ | May 4, 2018 | Pat Buchanan

Posted on 05/04/2018 3:32:54 PM PDT by Kaslin

Charges against Trump are to be brought, this is the arena, this is the forum, where the battle should be fought and the fate and future of the Trump presidency decided.

The goal of Mueller's prosecutors is to take down Trump on the cheap. If they can get him behind closed doors and make him respond in detail to questions -- to which they already know the answers -- any misstep by Trump could be converted into a perjury charge.

Trump has to score 100 on a test to which Mueller's team has all the answers in advance while Trump must rely upon memory.

Why take this risk?

By now, witnesses have testified in ways that contradict what Trump has said. This, plus Trump's impulsiveness, propensity to exaggerate, and often rash responses to hostile questions, would make him easy prey for the perjury traps prosecutors set up when they cannot convict their targets on the evidence.

Mueller and his team are the ones who need this interrogation.

For, after almost two years, their Russiagate investigation has produced no conclusive proof of the foundational charge -- that Trump's team colluded with Vladimir Putin's Russia to hack and thieve the emails of the Clinton campaign and DNC.

Having failed, Mueller & Co. now seek to prove that, even if Trump did not collude with the Russians, he interfered with their investigation.

How did Trump obstruct justice?

Did he suggest that fired NSC Advisor Gen. Mike Flynn might get a pardon? What was his motive in firing FBI Director James Comey? Did Trump edit the Air Force One explanation of the meeting in June 2016 between his campaign officials and Russians? Did he pressure Attorney General Jeff Sessions to fire Mueller?

Mueller's problem: These questions and more have all been aired and argued endlessly in the public square. Yet no national consensus has formed that Trump committed an offense to justify his removal. Even Democrats are backing away from talk of impeachment.

Trump's lawyers should tell Mueller to wrap up his work, as Trump will not be testifying, no matter what subpoena he draws up, or what the courts say he must do. And if Congress threatens impeachment for defying a court order, Trump should tell them: Impeach me and be damned.

Will a new Congress impeach and convict an elected president?

An impeachment battle would become a titanic struggle between a capital that detests Trump and a vast slice of Middle America that voted to repudiate that capital's elite, trusts Trump, and will stand by him to the end.

And in any impeachment debate before Congress and the cameras of the world, not one but two narratives will be heard.

The first is that Trump colluded with the Russians to defeat Hillary Clinton and then sought to obstruct an investigation of his collusion.

The second is the story of how an FBI cabal went into the tank on an investigation of Clinton to save her campaign. Then it used the product of a Clinton-DNC dirt-diving operation, created by a British spy with Russian contacts, to attempt to destroy the Trump candidacy. Now, failing that, it's looking to overthrow the elected president of the United States.

In short, the second narrative is that the "deep state" and its media auxiliaries are colluding to overturn the results of the 2016 election.

Unlike Watergate, with Russiagate, the investigators will be on trial as well.

Trump needs to shift the struggle out of the legal arena, where Mueller and his men have superior weapons, and into the political arena, where he can bring his populous forces to bear in the decision as to his fate.

This is the terrain on which Trump can win -- an us-vs-them fight, before Congress and country, where not only the alleged crimes of Trump are aired but also the actual crimes committed to destroy him and to overturn his victory.

Trump is a nationalist who puts America first both in trade and securing her frontiers against an historic invasion from the South. If he is overthrown, and the agenda for which America voted is trashed as well, it may be Middle America in the streets this time.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: impeachment; investigation; presidenttrump; robertmueller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last
To: All
Of all the spurious excuses she gives for her 2016 loss, the most ludicrous is that
Hillary says she lost her "sure-thing election" because "Putin doesn't like me."
Comey sucked up, he told Congress "Russia wanted to harm Hillary."

Hillary once bragged that she, alone, was brought into Putin's inner sanctum
where she assured Putin she was worried about wildlife like he was.

Putin whispered to Hilary that they were BFF.

Secy Hillary and Obama were eager to please Russia w/ the friendly reset button.
Hillary later said the reset gambit was Obama's and her idea "to strengthen Russia."

==============================================

Ex-Pres Clinton is s-o-o-o-o friendly he traveled to Russia to clinch the uranium giveaway deal.
And to pocket a $500,000 dollar speaking fee from a Moscow bank plus a sizeable commission.

Billyboo even laid his "Hot Damn Hokey Hillbilly Act" on Putin.

21 posted on 05/04/2018 4:37:54 PM PDT by Liz ((Our side has 8 trillion bullets;the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“Trump’s lawyers should tell Mueller to wrap up his work, as Trump will not be testifying, no matter what subpoena he draws up, or what the courts say he must do. And if Congress threatens impeachment for defying a court order, Trump should tell them: Impeach me and be damned.”

Yes!!


22 posted on 05/04/2018 4:39:08 PM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Or he could just take the 5th,and say it’s because Mueller already has prosecuted a guy - Flynn - for lying to the FBI, even though the FBI said he did not lie.


23 posted on 05/04/2018 4:47:00 PM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaveFerris
Federal judge today gave Mueller's prosecutor team 2 weeks to produce the unreacted memo or else. In a hearing on Manafort 's suit, claiming they stepped way outside what Mueller's mandate was.

He called their bulls*t.

Apparently called them liars in open court.

Maybe the tide is starting to slowing turn in Trump's favor.

24 posted on 05/04/2018 4:50:15 PM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt
Federal judge today gave Mueller's prosecutor team 2 weeks to produce the unreacted memo or else.

I don't understand why these deadlines to produce an already existing document are so long.

Two weeks to produce 10,000 documents, maybe. But two weeks to produce one single document? Unreal.

25 posted on 05/04/2018 4:54:46 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Williams

The impeachment threat is from Republicans, not Democrats.

The Democrats are just useful idiots for Ryan (Romney) and McConnell (Bush).


26 posted on 05/04/2018 4:55:00 PM PDT by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt

Two weeks to produce is ridiculous. How about, Produce it by COB today or this case is dismissed with prejudice!


27 posted on 05/04/2018 4:56:23 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Absolutely. Tell Mule-ear and his clown car to bugger off. Let him come after you. With what authority? And upon whom would he call to prosecute?

The president of the United States is not answerable to that schmuck.

28 posted on 05/04/2018 5:02:30 PM PDT by IronJack (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Articles like this are misleading because they're presenting this whole Mueller-Trump interview thing as if it's breaking news -- and yet the meeting between Mueller and Trump's legal team that precipitated all this discussion actually took place two months ago.

Mueller effectively gave up any chance he had of interviewing Trump when the FBI raided the office of Trump's lawyer in New York.

The goal of Mueller's prosecutors is to take down Trump on the cheap. If they can get him behind closed doors and make him respond in detail to questions -- to which they already know the answers -- any misstep by Trump could be converted into a perjury charge.

The bold item above is critical here. If Mueller's prosecutors already know the answers to the questions they want to ask Trump, then they don't need to question him in the first place.

This is why I suspect there would be no legal grounds to issue a subpoena in the first place.

29 posted on 05/04/2018 5:04:34 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I do like Pat Buchanan but, as with everyone who attempts to steer Donald Trump “for his own good” or for the Good of America, it is chasing after wisps and in the wrong direction. Donald Trump is on top of all of it. The truth is that if he can’t win then no one on America’s side can win and Utopia will be upon us within a year after his fall. We have necessarily put all of America’s eggs in that one Trump basket. We have to ride with it to its denouement. If he is shattered then get your weapons to hand. There will be a lot of use for them. We cannot add to his tactics except by our support. If we try to advise him what to do or try to steer him from what we fear he might do then we admit there was no good choice last November and He buys us only four years, not the quarter century Reagan got us. I thought there was no hope after Reagan left office because I thought there could be only one Reagan in a century or maybe a millennium and we had used up our ration for thrice that time because he had three at the same time, RR, Maggie and JPII, but then there is Trump.


30 posted on 05/04/2018 5:20:14 PM PDT by arthurus (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

Yup, damn the court and shame on them if they interfere in what amounts to a political argument.

I know we’re getting closer and closer to the weasel Rosenstein being fired and perhaps the weasel Sessions being fired sometime later.

All this will happen when the investigation is closed or at least closed in the eye of the public. It’s time to show them what happens when you take pot shots at the President.


31 posted on 05/04/2018 5:25:50 PM PDT by Fhios (Mr. Magoo, where are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: arthurus

Yes, ‘Let Trump be Trump’.

That slogan was posted in his campaign office.


32 posted on 05/04/2018 5:30:05 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Williams

” trump should demand articles of impeachment . . . “

I argued the same point here a week ago and my post/suggestion got pulled.

Trump should tell them to put up or shut up.


33 posted on 05/04/2018 6:06:54 PM PDT by Auslander154 ("Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kevao

If I were Trump I’d go right up to Rosenstein’s desk and demand to see the Scope notes that started this investigation travesty.

Every defendant has the right to know what he is being accused of.

Trump can demand to see it, declassify it, and reveal it to the public.

Or he can have Giulani go to Rosenstein or Sessions and demand its release.


34 posted on 05/04/2018 6:42:24 PM PDT by Auslander154 ("Political correctness does not legislate tolerance; it only organizes hatred." Jacques Barzun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Paulie

Be a shame if Mueller had an accident.


35 posted on 05/04/2018 6:45:27 PM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Auslander154
If I were Trump I’d go right up to Rosenstein’s desk and demand to see the Scope notes that started this investigation travesty.

I haven't figured out yet whether Trump is playing Nd chess or isn't fully aware of the awesome executive powers at his disposal to get the DoJ and FBI to immediately declassify, unredact, and deliver all documents requested by the Congress and Judiciary.

36 posted on 05/04/2018 6:50:43 PM PDT by kevao (Biblical Jesus: Give your money to the poor. Socialist Jesus: Give your neighbor's money to the poor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“Be a shame if Mueller had an accident.”

Yeah, send him Pheasant hunting with former VP, Dick Cheney. Only this time load the shotgun with 00 Buck!


37 posted on 05/04/2018 7:54:40 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kevao

“I don’t understand why these deadlines to produce an already existing document are so long.”

Well, I refer you to a “vote” in the US Senate. Something that should take 5 minutes, tops with 100 buttons, takes an hour and a half ( if you’re lucky) while these worthless pr!cks socialize in the Senate Chamber playing “after you, no after you” to have their votes recorded.


38 posted on 05/04/2018 7:57:34 PM PDT by vette6387
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I would be tempted to hire the very best ex-spooks to find all the dirt on Mueller and Weissmann and simply go public with it: no implicit or explicit blackmail, just scorched earth without warning. These two have many bodies buried.

I am not saying it would be the best thing to do. I am saying that I would be tempted if I were a billionaire who was being abused like this under the color of law.


39 posted on 05/04/2018 8:41:04 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - J. R. R. Tolkien)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Sadly we will never prosecute and convict these criminal bastards, and they will be back again with a vengeance in 7 years or so


40 posted on 05/05/2018 3:54:47 AM PDT by ronnie raygun (Trump plays chess the rest are still playing checkers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson