Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sources: Kim agrees to meet Trump at DMZ
CNN ^ | 30 Apr 2018 | Will Ripley

Posted on 04/30/2018 4:18:53 PM PDT by mandaladon

According to sources familiar with the matter, South Korea's President Moon Jae-in has convinced North Korean leader Kim Jong Un that the Korean Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) is the best site for President Trump and Kim Jong Un's summit.

(Excerpt) Read more at edition.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: china; clintonnonnews; cnn; finshtank; japan; kim; korea; maga; margarettalev; pyongyang; republicofkorea; russia; trumo; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
To: mandaladon

Not good.


21 posted on 04/30/2018 5:01:19 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
Correct. This is can be viewed as a capitulation for the USA to go all the way over to Korea on equal terms; prediction: Kim will also stand on the dividing line and ask him to step over into North Korea, another propaganda ploy. North Korea 1 , US 0 on tactics and imagery. I would never have accepted anything ****near** Korea, maybe Singapore or Mongolia but no not Korea. I would have tactically gotten Kim as far away from his base as possible. Now NORTH KOREA WILL say to their people and the world that they "made Trump come to Korea"...the third such US president they have done that too. Clinton and Carter being the others all the way to Pyongyang.

Damn these guys play a sharp game.

22 posted on 04/30/2018 5:06:54 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (CONSISTENT on my North Korean observations for 20 years on FR during Dem/GOP regime alike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

“According to sources familiar with the matter, ...”

F$#@ CNN.


23 posted on 04/30/2018 5:15:27 PM PDT by Gator113 ( ~~Trump 2020~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

The original armistice agreement in 1953 was negotiated at a site northwest of Panmunjom Peace Village. The blue huts which straddle the military demarcation line were used for ad hoc meetings regarding disputes between the parties on maintaining the armistice. Freedom House was built by the South Koreans for reunification talks and is south of the demarcation line.


24 posted on 04/30/2018 5:21:42 PM PDT by Procyon (Decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, demonopolize, decredentialize, disentitle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Trump will not meet Kim at the line. That was strictly a North/South dance. They will meet at Freedom House. I even suspect they won’t be photographed shaking hands until Trump is satisfied that there’s a deal.


25 posted on 04/30/2018 5:26:32 PM PDT by Procyon (Decentralize, degovernmentalize, deregulate, demonopolize, decredentialize, disentitle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Kim doesn’t have a plane that will take him far


26 posted on 04/30/2018 5:35:20 PM PDT by Sybeck1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Procyon

Thanks for the specific information.


27 posted on 04/30/2018 5:36:49 PM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

You may be right, Trump is such an amateur negotiator Kim is going to roll him not only with imaginary, but in the negotiations itself.

As your posts suggest, Trump is going to get his ass handed to him


28 posted on 04/30/2018 5:37:19 PM PDT by Balding_Eagle ( The Great Wall of Trump ---- 100% sealing of the border. Coming soon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Tongil!


29 posted on 04/30/2018 5:42:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

Yeah, me too. Don’t like the fact that the President would be too close to the North Korean border. When you ask for a sit down with the commander in chief of the worlds most powerful military HE picks the site of the sit down, not you.


30 posted on 04/30/2018 5:48:59 PM PDT by jmacusa ("Made it Ma, top of the world!'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

The fact is, he risks boxing himself into a corner which surprises me since he is known to be such a good negotiator. It’s so out of character. Very puzzling


31 posted on 04/30/2018 5:53:22 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (CONSISTENT on my North Korean observations for 20 years on FR during Dem/GOP regime alike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Procyon

Kim will insist Trump come to the line, so that he can be appropriately met protocol-wise. You would not have this in Singapore or Ulan Bator. Well they cannot do it ion Kuala Lumpur because that is where Kim had his brother nerve gassed to death.

It’s (the line) only about 75 meters away from Freedom House anyway. Just watch.


32 posted on 04/30/2018 5:57:33 PM PDT by AmericanInTokyo (CONSISTENT on my North Korean observations for 20 years on FR during Dem/GOP regime alike)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

We need to send Kanye West and Dennis Rodman.


33 posted on 04/30/2018 6:23:32 PM PDT by EEGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa; fishtank
`When you ask for a sit down with the commander in chief of the worlds most powerful military HE picks the site of the sit down, not you.

Bingo. As a general proposition that is a strong argument. Of course, this announcement re the DMZ could be BS or a floater by one of the parties to gauge reaction.

On the face of it, the two Korean leaders should meet at the DMZ not to negotiate but to ink a treaty already agreed to. There is a very real question of whether it is prudent for Trump to be present at the DMZ for any meeting at all. He could very formally congratulate them later at some other location, such as perhaps the UN.

Any rationale for Trump's presence could also be used to support the presence of Putin and the Chinese leader. Such would certainly calm any concerns about security.

OTOH, if Trump thinks his presence is wise then there may be more in play than is apparent to those of us on the sidewalk.

34 posted on 04/30/2018 6:44:15 PM PDT by frog in a pot (Obama's "Remaking of America" continues apace in the absence of political opposition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Excellent.


35 posted on 04/30/2018 6:57:36 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fishtank

I understand your concern.

But there are also good reasons to hold it there. Remember, thi.s is where the two Korean leaders met recently


36 posted on 04/30/2018 7:00:24 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Innovative

Thank you. You were most polite, and today, on this thread, that was a rare grace.


37 posted on 04/30/2018 7:08:53 PM PDT by fishtank (The denial of original sin is the root of liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo

Trump has already flown over NK in AF1


38 posted on 04/30/2018 7:09:00 PM PDT by Despot of the Delta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Soon the press will say Trump is colluding with NK.


39 posted on 04/30/2018 7:10:37 PM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Even though fat boy is evil, he could be a hero to bring his country into the modern era.
He could make the economy boom there.

But odds are against it.


40 posted on 04/30/2018 7:18:58 PM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (I don't want better government; I want much less of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson