Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Full title: Connecticut lawmakers pass measure to give electoral votes to presidential candidate who wins popular vote
1 posted on 04/27/2018 4:30:43 PM PDT by lowbridge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last
To: lowbridge
This will last until one or both of two things happen: (1) a candidate wins Connecticut by a wide margin, but loses the popular vote in the "allied" states, and the Connecticut voters find their electoral votes going to the candidate that lost in their state; or (2) one of the consortium decides to renege on the deal. It is entirely likely that if (1) does happen, (2) will follow shortly.

As others have pointed out, it is within the power of the state governments to do this. It will be fun to watch the bodies bounce if they do and the inevitable happens.

40 posted on 04/27/2018 5:43:26 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

Throwing out the electoral college goes hand in hand with throwing out the bill of rights. We are not a democracy and were never meant to be.


43 posted on 04/27/2018 6:33:43 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This is a half measure solution, at best.

The EC was designed to equal one vote for each House District, one for each Senate seat and a few more for territories and DC...539 total; so need 270 for majority.

Best model:
For each House District, the EV goes to the winner of the popular vote in the District.
Foe each Senate Seat, the EV goes to winner of the popular vote in the State.
Territories and DC can be popular vote determined.

This model assures NO state is controlled by its largest metro areas, and further assures we will not be determined by the vote in NYC, LA, CHI, PHIL, STL.
In Ohio, for instance, popular vote would be controlled by the vote in Columbus, Cincinnati, Cleveland and Dayton, with Toledo as a margin. The rest of us would be left to the whims of the libturd cities.
Same goes for other states...MN, WI, MI, most of the NE states and the PNW states.

This popular vote crap at the state level is BAD policy.


48 posted on 04/27/2018 7:01:15 PM PDT by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. Mr Trump, we've got your six.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

What them Dems won’t do - in this case Connecticut would be willing to say the hell with what her voters wanted and a candidate who got 80% of Connecticut would get zero EC votes if the other candidate won the popular vote....


55 posted on 04/28/2018 4:15:24 AM PDT by trebb (I stopped picking on the mentally ill hypocrites who pose as conservatives...mostly ;-})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: lowbridge

This travesty can be challenged and will lose.

The votes actually cast for the electors must prevail


57 posted on 04/28/2018 4:20:57 AM PDT by Thibodeaux (Long Live the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-25 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson