Posted on 04/27/2018 12:16:27 PM PDT by WisconsinRep
Trey Gowdy: Comey’s ‘Leak’ is Actually a Crime
Congressman slams the former FBI Director
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qGO2YmlAqgI
Speaking with Fox News, Congressman Trey Gowdy said former FBI Director James Comey disseminated classified information and called it a “leak,” when in reality it’s a felony.
Democrats. Break the law and use semantics to get out of crimes.
Lock him up!!!
Jeff Sessions has been AG for 1 year, 2 months, 18 days.
Trey, it is not a crime unless Jeff Sessions says it is a crime. And as much as I had hopes for Sessions, Comey is not going to be prosecuted anytime soon.
gowdy is all over the damn place. He does not know crap from shinola.
“Break the law and use semantics to get out of crimes.”
Well, that all depends, of course, on what the meaning of “is” is. And, who has the “controlling authority.”
Let's see if the IG report has anything to say.
He didn’t think what Shillery did was a crime either. Intent! In other words, if you are stupid you are not guilty. BS! Hang the bastard.
I like Gowdy and pray for true justice, like Mueller personally putting the cuffs on hildabeast.
Thank God Roosterhead is retiring.
Let's see if the IG report has anything to say.LOL! And then what?
Judicial Watch says the IG is where truth goes to die.
Gowdy said it better, it’s a felony. crime can be taken too lightly.
Quit Whining Gowdy, you Are part of the problem yourself. Not ONCE in All the Sham Hearings you held did you Assert Your Constitutional Authority and DEMAND these lying, quisling, traitors be immediately Arrested and Imprisoned in the CONGRESSIONAL JAIL!!!
Congress has ALL the power in washington, the executive and judicial branch operate according to the whims of CONGRESS!
“U.S. CODE
TITLE 2—THE CONGRESS
CHAPTER 6—CONGRESSIONAL AND COMMITTEE PROCEDURE; INVESTIGATIONS
Sec. 193. Privilege of witnesses
No witness is privileged to refuse to testify to any fact, or to produce any paper, respecting which he shall be examined by either House of Congress, or by any joint committee established by a joint or concurrent resolution of the two Houses of Congress, or by any committee of either House, upon the ground that his testimony to such fact or his production of such paper may tend to disgrace him or otherwise render him infamous.”
Simply look up Hinds Precedents, especially chapters 53 and 51, and Cannon’s Precedents, especially chapters 184-185. You’ll find numerous detailed cases of Congress asserting its power, arresting people, holding them until they agreed to answer questions, and then releasing them. Some of these people did not refuse to appear, but simply failed to satisfactorily answer questions. One has to wonder how a previous Congress might have responded to Alberto Gonzales’s endless recitations of “I do not recall.”
Congress can Remove the President
Congress can remove the head of every executive agency Congress can remove ALL of their employees
Congress can Abolish every agency they so choose
Congress can remove EVERY JUDGE IN AMERICA, including every supreme court justice.
Congress can abolish every federal court except the supreme Court
Congress can decide which cases the Judicial Branch can hear and decide
CONGRESS can Imprison ANYONE they want for any reason they so desire for as long as they wish.
Congress can declare WAR
No other governing body has even 10% of the power CONGRESS has!!
CONGRESS IS ALLOWING ALL OF IT!!!
Congress has the authority to arrest and imprison those found in Contempt. The power extends throughout the United States and is an inherent power (does not depend upon legislated act)
If found in Contempt the person can be arrested under a warrant of the Speaker of the House of Representatives or President of the Senate, by the respective Sergeant at Arms.
Statutory criminal contempt is an alternative to inherent contempt.
Under the inherent contempt power Congress may imprison a person for a specific period of time or an indefinite period of time, except a person imprisoned by the House of Representatives may not be imprisoned beyond adjournment of a session of Congress.
Imprisonment may be coercive or punitive.
Some references
[1] Joseph Story’s Commentaries on the Constitution, Volume 2, § 842 http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/print_documents/a1_5s21.html
[2] Anderson v. Dunn - 19 U.S. 204 - “And, as to the distance to which the process might reach, it is very clear that there exists no reason for confining its operation to the limits of the District of Columbia; after passing those limits, we know no bounds that can be prescribed to its range but those of the United States.” http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/19/204/case.html
[3] Jurney v. MacCracken, 294 U.S. 125 http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/294/125/case.html 73rd Cong., 78 Cong. Rec. 2410 (1934) https://archive.org/details/congressionalrec78aunit
[4] McGrain v. Daugherty, 273 U.S. 135 - Under a warrant issued by the President of the Senate the Deputy to the Senate Sergeant at Arms arrested at Cincinnati, Ohio, Mally S. Daugherty, who had been twice subpoenaed by the Senate and twice failed to appear. http://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/273/135/case.html
[5] Rules of the House of Representatives, Rule IV Duties of the Sergeant at Arms - [] execute the commands of the House, and all processes issued by authority thereof, directed to him by the Speaker. http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/HMAN-105/pdf/HMAN-105-pg348.pdf
[6] An analysis of Congressional inquiry, subpoena, and enforcement http://www.constitutionproject.org/documents/when-congress-comes-calling-a-primer-on-the-principles-practices-and-pragmatics-of-legislative-inquiry/
In 1857, a New York Times reporter refused to say which members of Congress had asked him to get them bribes (protecting his “sources” just as various Judith Millers today protect the people who feed them proven lies that costs thousands of lives), so Congress locked him up until he answered and then banned him from Congress.
In 1924 an oil executive appeared but refused to answer certain questions, so the Senate held — literally held — him in contempt. Senator Thomas Walsh of Montana argued that this question of contempt was of the gravest importance, and that it involved “the very life of the effective existence of the House of Representatives of the United States and of the Senate of the United States.” The matter was taken to court, and the witness fined and imprisoned.
Quisling POS
One of the reasons Comey was fired was because he usurped the office of the Attorney General when he claimed Hillary hadn't committed a prosecutable crime. Looks like he didn't learn his lesson.
But he was the law.
Well, I gave her into God’s hands along with Sen Kennedy and Sen Daschle. If hillary hadn’t been so evil and Sec of State, would we have known how entrenched the deep state swamp creature tentacles are? Have faith. God does indeed have a plan. Even if it does eventually include invasion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.