[Lurking Libertarian]

Wait, what?!? A "judge" ruled against "freedom of speech" because there is no rule against discrimination based on political speech? This moron is not fit to clean a real judge's shoes. How can his stupid-*ss be thrown off the bench?

Freedom of speech protects against adverse action by the government, not by private businesses.

[Garth Tater]

"Freedom of speech protects against adverse action by the government, not by private businesses."

I don't think you learned that in school. Not in the last thirty years anyway...

[so_real]

I don't subscribe to the notion of private business being allowed to say "we don't serve your kind here" any more than I subscribe to the notion that gay couple can demand a private business put two male figurines on a "wedding" cake. Take the product as it is produced or shop elsewhere.