Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump on Earth Day: 'Strong, market-driven economy is essential' to protecting environment
The Washington Examiner ^ | April 22, 2018 | Melissa Quinn

Posted on 04/22/2018 1:25:35 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

President Trump celebrated Earth Day on Sunday with a message promoting how a “healthy environment and a strong economy go hand in hand.”

“We know that it is impossible for humans to flourish without clean air, land, and water. We also know that a strong, market-driven economy is essential to protecting these resources,” the president said in his message. “For this reason, my administration is dedicated to removing unnecessary and harmful regulations that restrain economic growth and make it more difficult for local communities to prosper and to choose the best solutions for their environment.

“Already, we are making great economic progress in concert with—not in opposition to—protecting our environment.”

Trump vowed on the campaign trail to undo a number of environmental regulations implemented during the Obama administration and has followed through with that promise. He also announced last year the U.S. would be withdrawing from the Paris climate agreement.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: earthday; trumpenvironment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: rlmorel

Trump gives me the warm fuzzies.


21 posted on 04/22/2018 2:59:01 PM PDT by JPJones (More tariffs, less income tax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

😍😍


22 posted on 04/22/2018 3:00:11 PM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

They can outrage all they want. Progressive environmentalism is about Marxism not the environment. It takes money to do things the right way and socialism doesn’t create wealth it destroys it.


23 posted on 04/22/2018 3:10:24 PM PDT by TigersEye (This is the age of the death of reason.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

You can’t protect the environment without money. Such a simple concept, but one evidently difficult to grasp for a great many people.


24 posted on 04/22/2018 3:47:49 PM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc

I can’t f-ing stand this fake as sh*t day as the country wraps its arms around it. People need to look up the POS trash Leftist Murderer Einhorn.


25 posted on 04/22/2018 3:52:16 PM PDT by shanover (...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr Ramsbotham
You can’t protect the environment without money.

It is incredibly simple. It's a luxury that we are able to afford thanks to capitalism. Private ownership helps as well since individuals are environmentalists, not the government.

26 posted on 04/22/2018 4:57:36 PM PDT by palmer (...if we do not have strong families and strong values, then we will be weak and we will not survive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: palmer; Mr Ramsbotham; TigersEye; PROCON
In the USA, Congress writes the environmental laws just like the constitution says and the prez implements and enforces the laws that Congress wrote just like the constitution says.

And the prez has an executive agency called the EPA to help him. By trial ands error, the state agencies also have a role in environmental law. The EPA sets the standards and each state determines how it will achieve that standard. The state submits an environmental plan to EPA and when the EPA approves a state's enviro plan, it is difficult for the enviros to sue the state.

Of course all of this is subject to judicial review and the courts hand down decisions that have the force of law. For example: In 2007 SCOTUS ruled that CO2 was a pollutant and EPA should determine the risk that CO2 posed to the nation and if need be, EPA could regulate CO2 with the Clean Air Act, which means they needed nothing from Congress.

In the coming year there will be about 10-12-15 issues before the court that you will be hearing about and CO2 is one of those issues.

Another is the Toxic Substances Control Act which was originally enacted in the 70s but was updated by Congress in 2016. Obama got a little of that implemented but Trump never gets anything done so he is way behind on his rule making. Plus, he hired someone from the chemical industry to write the rules so the lawsuits have already started flying

27 posted on 04/22/2018 5:32:30 PM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I agree 100%.

I’m so glad Trump is president.


28 posted on 04/22/2018 5:34:08 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Give a man a fish and he'll be a Democrat. Teach a man to fish and he'll be a responsible citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shanover

After that, they need to pull their heads out of their butts.

Greentardism could be cured in mere months.


29 posted on 04/22/2018 5:47:55 PM PDT by dsc (Our system of government cannot survive one-party control of communications.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson