Leaking unrelated attorney-client documents of other people (and Trump) is the entire purpose of the sham raid.
Paying Stormy Daniels is not an FEC violation. There are ample non-campaign reasons to pay her (e.g., protecting the Trump commercial brand). When there are mixed purposes, outside money is fine. The FEC already said this.
The entire fake raid was a sham done on a non-crime, for political purposes.
My understanding is that Mr. Trump used his own money to pay Daniels, which is remarkably different than the John Edwards case where third parties made payments to Edward's mistress to keep her quiet during the campaign. Even so, Edwards was acquitted on most charges and had a hung jury on the remaining charges. Indeed, if the payment to Stormy Daniels is an FEC violation, than so is every payment made to the victims of sexual harassment and misconduct committed by members of Congress.
And so what if the evidence gets suppressed from use in Court? It's not like the KGB...I mean FBI,...can somehow "unknow" it. They will use this information to intimidate and silence countless others.