Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HotHunt

We care because this again reaffirms the ongoing liberal campaign against Chick Fil A, a campaign based on lies and distortion and half truths.


8 posted on 04/16/2018 8:04:08 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego; HotHunt

Yep, if lies and distortions are not answered and rebutted, they’re likely to be believed by the intellectually unwary.


17 posted on 04/16/2018 8:21:09 AM PDT by fwdude (History has no 'sides;' you're thinking of geometry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Dilbert San Diego
Not sure why I should spend what little free time I have in my life to give a whole hill of beans what The New Yorker thinks. I already know what they think. They are liberals. They always lie, distort and provided half-truths and always will.

I'm sure Chick-Fil-A are big boys. This isn't their first rodeo defending themselves against an enemy like liberals.

One thing The New Yorker magazine hatred will not do is turn their customers against them. Their customers love the place.

The only reason The New Yorker writes this trash is to flash their liberal, anti-Christian bonafides to their own liberal readership. The article is not directed at "us".

One of the reasons I live outside the metropolitan areas of this country is to avoid liberals. I live in rural Florida. Not many liberals around these parts.

So again, why should I care what The New Yorker thinks of Chick-Fil-A in NYC? I shouldn't. Waste of time.

40 posted on 04/16/2018 9:52:00 AM PDT by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson