To: adorno
Nit half wit. The top executive has the power to hire and fire. No one said anything about due process or not. You’re making up my argument so you can pretend to have relevant point. BTW some of these criminals serve at the “pleasure of” or “at will” and thereIS NO due process for those positions. Get a clue and get a life.
You’re argument is an indication you are lonely in your room, with only Rosie Palm and her five sisters to keep you company. Since there is school tomorrow, I look forward to your early bed time so the adults can talk in peace.
To: morphing libertarian
The top executive has the power to hire and fire.
No shit Sherlock.
But, he cannot fire at will, or personal gratifications, or for political revenge. And, he cannot fire anybody when it is deemed to be obstruction of justice. Comey and McCabe were not about obstruction of justice. Sessions should be fired because he's conflicted and ineffective in the Mueller case, and he/we need somebody else that does not have the same conflicts and can take on Comey from a "fresh" perspective.
Hillary and Lynch and Obama and Comey and McCabe and a many in high positions in the FBI/DOJ,do need to be brought up on charges of abuse of law-enforcement powers, and even on collusion to effect the outcome of the 2016 election. BUT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... that needs to happen under legally authorized powers, and not under the knee-jerk type of law that you want the president to invoke
People serve at the pleasure of he president, and he hires and fires, but, he can't go around abusing his powers. That kind of abuse of power is what Obama and Bill Clinton and dictatorships are known for.
If Trump were to do as you wish, he would become a former president a lot sooner than his end-of-term in office.
So, even with your 2 brain cells, you should be able to understand a little bit of common sense. But, I doubt it.
652 posted on
04/16/2018 7:47:25 AM PDT by
adorno
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson