The Eurasian Russian trolls, Iranian Arab parasts and western neo-Nazis demand proof, but Russia will fight to stop anyone from seeing evidence.
Inspections? It worked so well in Iraq.
What team of morons wants to go to Syria during their civil war to inspect for chemical weapons?
My vote? Get out of Syria and leave it to the Syrians and the Russians. We do not have viable options that would be better than Assad, so we should stay out. Anything we do will either (1) prolong the civil war, or (2) replace Assad with someone far worse.
Gee whiz, we thought Obama and Kerry accomplished this 5 years ago. /s
Not going to rid Syria or the al-Assad of chemical weapons, period.
Al-Assad regime hands off what they do have to Russia, Russia asserts that Syria and al-Assad regime has no nukes (as does the retards who seek to verify). Once all quiets down, Russia quietly hands them back to Syria and the al-Assad regime.
/Fail
A Swedish “an investigative panel” would consist of mostly ‘Asian immigrants’ ...
There’s one characteristic that many conspiracy theorists have in common: an abnormal extent of narcissism.
Here’s a reiteration of the topic for this thread in regards to Russia blocking an investigation and trying to hide the evidence of the gas attack against civilians.
Russia Stood Alone. China Didn’t Help Vote Down Trump’s Syria UN Resolution
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3647183/posts
The Swedes must have decided that a slow agonizing suicide makes no sense when they can grab Syria’s gas and chemicals and kill themselves quickly.
Nice idea but doomed to fail. No one in Syria reads Swedish.
Meanwhile, the EU is doing big biz with Iran.
Go figure.
Seems I remember this very same thing a couple of years ago. So, Syria really didn’t give them up? I vote...ignite them.
So? Under a 2013 US-Russia deal that averted US-led strikes, Syria agreed to give up its chemical weapons stockpile and sign the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) which bans the use of toxic gases in warfare. How’s that working for us?
And if that doesn’t make you laugh, the five permanent seats established in the 1940’s on the counsel are China, the largest makers of bio warfare products in the world, France, one of the top chemical producers on earth of resin and sarin gas, Russia, nuff said there, The UK who are also in the running for production of chemical weapons, and the US who gave VX to Iraq to fight Iran in the early 80’s. (And we still haven’t recovered or destroyed all of it).
When the five main members of the committee (Security counsel) to pass on a concern have a vested interest in trying to manipulate the situation there since the early 1960’s and before, will anyone ever see the Swedish proposal in the main body? Not as they wrote it. That one will be watered down so bad the saturated pages will fall apart on the way to the room.
rwood
Again?
Removal of Syria’s chemical weapons material complete, announces OPCW-UN mission