Posted on 04/11/2018 12:24:07 PM PDT by detective
uring an interview with Fox News host Harris Faulkner today U.S. Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) discussed a response letter he received from FBI Director Christopher Wray.
Senator Paul inquired with the FBI Director about whether reassigned FBI Agent Peter Strzok and DOJ/FBI Attorney Lisa Page still retained their Top Secret FBI clearances.
According to Senator Paul, the FBI director would not respond to specific agent inquiry, however, Wray did affirm that all existing FBI officials retain Top Secret clearances.
In essence, Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, despite being removed from investigative authority over their role in the political efforts to target President Trump, retain employment within the DOJ/FBI apparatus in an unknown capacity and thereby their clearances.
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
Really?
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha!
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha!
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha!
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha!
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha!
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha!
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha!
hahahahahahahahahahahaaha!
Wow. Still lots of gullible folks out there.
Everybody has an opinion. Mine is that DOJ and FBI have played fast and loose with the rules since Holder. That’s nearly a decade. I wouldn’t bet one dollar that Strzok and Page have been excluded from classified information. Not that a dollar amounts to much, but I’d rather keep one than be, imo, 99.9% likely to lose the bet.
Ha! Since Holder? Read about what Senator Brewster, the FBI and IRS did with Howard Hughes...
Been going on for many years.
Well past time to Repeal the 16th and 17th Amendments.
>>Nothing happened to them.<<
If there had been a real Attorney General for the past year, Strzok and Page would have been indicted and tried for their crimes by now.
The Deep State skulduggery has been going on since at least the Kennedy assassination. However, you were mentioning rules that govern and restrict access to classified information. I don’t believe those have been enforced for ~a decade.
Actually it is not that hard to remove clearances and that action doesn’t have to await a reevaluation. It is done for cause, when someone’s actions or trust has been called into question. And, even if full removal was hard, suspension is not. The issue here is there is corruption in the FBI leadership who knows full well that there is justification, based on their actions, to, at a minimum, suspend their clearances. (Truth be known, the same would apply to Rosenstein and others in DOJ)
Watch and read. They’ve likely testified to a grand jury, along with Priestrap and Ohr.
+1
All true..to a point...but they cannot by law tell you the status or even what level of secret clearences a government employee has... only they have one..and its current till lapsed.
Im not defending these idiots... they are all dirt bags...even the politicians
So your leap to the FBI is dirty is no more valid than a politician making a statement about the status a of a government employee and the status of their clearences to wind up the masses and appear to care.... Your position is just as much a manipulation of the circumstances to make a point or validate an opinion or garner an political opinion.. by law the Federal government can only acknowledge a person has a clearence or not... anything past that is leaking or bullsnot...
Cheers
In order to believe that, you'd have to believe our government is more than just the worlds largest criminal enterprise. I will no longer support that proposition.
“So your leap to the FBI is dirty is no more valid than a politician...” My statement regarding the corrupt FBI and DOJ is not based solely on the fact that the clearances have not been taken away from these two, but on the actions of Rosenstein, Mueller, Comey and the host of other “politicos” who have corrupted those organizations and have not been brought to justice by those in charge — new or old. My original statement was, I believe, that this was just more examples of the corruption. So, we’ll just have to disagree.
Thanks detective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.