Posted on 04/11/2018 8:19:36 AM PDT by Simon Green
I agree and any attempt to sell this as 3-D chess is ridiculous.
It was. Deal with it.
What are you arguing for anyway when you thanked me here?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3646670/posts?page=86#86
Sorry, juvenile insistence on your part doesn't equate to the "coherent conversation" you opined for. Perhaps the suggestion that an extended stay in Vietnam wasn't such a good idea??? Think about it and get back to the board with an adult comment, okay?
Answer: WE WERE ATTACKED!!!
Answer: Totalitarian leadership that violates the individual sovereignty of citizens has no moral right to claim state sovereignty.
What's good for the goose (Syrian gas attacks forfeit their national sovereignty and justify foreign attack) is good for the gander (daily infanticide sanctioned by the U.S. government forfeits our national sovereignty and justifies foreign attack).
Time for YOU to answer a question:
Do you honestly believe the United States that violates the sovereignty of it’s unborn or partially-born citizens with deliberate murder has a moral right to claim state sovereignty?
Answer, without equivocation. Yes or no.
Wrong, that does not equate to invasion. I’m talking in philosophical terms.
No.
Not by Germany.
I think it was a good idea.
Yes, agree totally.
“So?”
Do you need an explanation of that platform’s capability?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.