Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Avalon Memories

A lawyer-client relationship is not sacrosanct if there is evidence that the lawyer and the client are co-conspirators in a crime.


53 posted on 04/09/2018 1:47:56 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I saw a werewolf drinking a pina colada at Trader Vic's.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

A lawyer-client relationship is not sacrosanct if there is evidence that the lawyer and the client are co-conspirators in a crime.
_______________________________________________
It is not sacrosanct but the privilege is Constitutionally based and requires high level DoJ approvals before the search can occur. In this case, it appears the Deep State is using Daniels like they used Carter Page as a ruse to rummage through Cohen’s and Trump’s documents. My guess is that Cohen is going to rip them a new one. Let’s have the names of those who were in the chain of approvals for this search.


209 posted on 04/09/2018 3:43:44 PM PDT by iontheball (lLL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
A lawyer-client relationship is not sacrosanct if there is evidence that the lawyer and the client are co-conspirators in a crime.


Yes, you may be technically correct. But why the push to prosecute Trump, and the absolute non prosecuting of Hilary destroying subpoenaed emails, mishandling classified materiel, etc.? Two tiered justice system?
247 posted on 04/09/2018 8:03:46 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie (The MSM is the enemy of the American people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson