Replies

To repeat, yet again, I said Trump needed to “start the process of removing a couple of the key obstructors".

***************

Rod Rosenweasel is still in his job. He is still in a key position as the de facto AG. He is a key obstructor who is still blocking congress’ requests for documents and the performance of its lawful investigations. As you probably know, Nunes threated a contempt of Congress resolution and subpoenas for Rosenweasel and FBI Director Christopher Wray.

Trump haters and cabal operatives Peter Strzok and FBI lawyer Lisa Page are still working for the FBI (albeit in different positions) and reportedly still have their top secret clearances. What kind of message does that send to other resistors in the organization?

The forthcoming IG report will likely identify more key obstructors (Obama holdovers) who have stonewalled, lied and concealed information.

Removing Comey and McCabe were significant steps, but just a start toward removing the infestation. It will take the removal of a couple more high value targets (read: key obstructors) like Rosenweasel and his fellow travelers for the corrupt resisters to get the message that they are no longer in control.

Trump hasn’t removed enough key people yet to achieve the desired results. I think firing Rosenweasel would send a very loud message.

To repeat, yet again, I said Trump needed to “start the process of removing a couple of the key obstructors".

I guess the Director of the FBI and others don't rate in your naive world. Again, if ya think the vicious corrupt entrenched deep state will get the message, roll over and play nice with Trump if only he fires a couple of them, you're a naive dreamer.

I think you're a political poser. You tell me Trump only needs fire a couple of people, but then after a cursory search, I find you stated this below:

Trump could have removed a lot of the Obama appointees who are still in their jobs, obstructing Trump at every turn. At a bare minimum, the upper layers of DOJ and State should have been cleaned out

So which is it? Just a couple of people or a lot of people? Entire upper layers of Departments at DOJ and the State Department??

Trump told you and everyone else he went into this trying to bring everyone together to work together as the country was so divided. If he'd walked in and did what you suggested, firing nearly everyone in sight. it would have been seen as political war, confrontational, radical, extreme etc. The media would be dancing etc...

If Trump went into this firing agency officials and all the upper level people in multiple agencies, it would precipitate a political firestorm, ignite a media circus, and probably cause some serious social unrest. It would also turn those officials into sympathetic figures, if not political martyrs. The reality of the consequences would be just too great and disruptive.

Btw Starboard, do the above words look familiar to you?☺