Posted on 04/03/2018 1:11:08 PM PDT by RevelationDavid
“When Free Republic controls 90% of the market, I will oppose it’s ability to censor opinions.”
I doubt youtube controls 90% of the market, but okay. Nothing is stopping anyone from making their own video site, and there are plenty of alternatives out there. So, simply being very popular or successful in your niche makes you exempt from exercising the rights of a private business owner, is that the test?
Conditioned to execute certain instructions, while getting therapy for their depression. Handler triggers the shooter, sits back, and watches the mayhem on TV. Then their bosses contact their propaganda outlets to push gun control. Considering some of the crap going on with the FBI right now, it is not a hard sell.
“Furthermore, FR does not pretend to be anything other than what it is. FB, Twitter, Instagram, and similar places pretend that they are open and free when they are hard left and more likely than not are tools of the Deep State.”
I don’t think they really pretend to be “open and free”, not according to their terms of service at least.
“They are collecting our data and using it against us or selling it to people who will use it against us.”
Which is also pretty clearly delineated in their terms of service.
“There is no “shadow banning” on FR. You have to work pretty hard to get zotted and if you do, it’s aboveboard, not behind your back. From what I hear, people get a warning first and are told why.”
They do have some rather inconsistent standards for banning content, so that’s a fair objection.
“There are hundreds if not thousands of other places where content that is unwelcome here can be posted. So no one is being silenced.”
The same can be said for youtube as well.
“Don’t like it here? Go to DU.”
I like it here just fine. I’m not one of the ones arguing that private website owners aren’t entitled to run their own websites how they like. I just think people should be consistent in their opinions on the matter, and not advocate one set of rules for websites they like, an another for websites they don’t like.
And right on schedule - but it’s not a “conspiracy”.
I’m not even sure that would work. I think guys would find her pretty cute and want to see her sex tape!
Maybe if she had a tape where she discusses how Trump’s policies actually help minorities and gays and women better than the pandering of the left does, they will ban her tape.
I donno. I’m rather partial to intense and passionate blondes.
Keltec P-32
Beretta 32 Tom Cat
Century Arms MBP-32
North American Arms Guardian 32 caliber
Seecamp LWS-32
Appears the shooter demonetized herself.
Why didn’t she just do that and not hurt anyone else?
What we have here is the almost end result of third-wave feminism.
The end result will be a woman hurting others, and the cops will let her go because obviously those victims must have done something to her to deserve what they got.
I’d wager the employees wish they had a gun.
It was always SF General Emergency to me, I worked there for a time as the lead engineer on their mainframe computers.
Zuckerberg recently made a large donation and it was renamed for him.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3644638/posts?page=252#252
See Sarah’s post above; any connection to the people in the screen cap in your post here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3644638/posts?page=23#23
?
Oh I would not bet that.
Exactly what I was thinking.
Fake News on that. Shooter was a female.
“I’d wager the employees wish they had a gun.”
Nope. Liberals. Dumb enough to wish the shooter didn’t have a gun...and got more hugs.
What?
Europe is?
Taking kids to be gang raped by muslim *immigrants* is a better place to raise your kids?
And you can’t own a gun to defend yourself either.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.