Let's try it. I don't have a FB account.......
Posted on 04/03/2018 10:48:12 AM PDT by detective
An image of the San Damiano Cross, showing Jesus in glory, “reigning from his cruciform throne,” has been rejected by Facebook because of its “shocking content.”
“This is what the monitors at Facebook consider excessively violent, sensational, and shocking,” said a statement from Franciscan University of Steubenville, Ohio.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
There is no freedom of speech or freedom of religion on social media.
They would NEVER EVER ban pictures of Mohamed
There is no freedom of religion on Free Republic, either. Like Facebook it is a privately held site and we’re all guests here.
If we don’t like it we can leave. That goes for Fakebook, too.
What bothers me about articles like this one is that they are subtly lobbying the religious and conservative public to accept the notion of government regulation over the internet.
And that is far more upsetting to me than the fact of Fakebook not liking Christianity.
Say what?
I wonder if Mark Zuckerberg would ban his own religion on Facebook.
Mark Zuckerberg was born in 1984 in White Plains, New York. He is the son of Karen (née Kempner), a psychiatrist, and Edward Zuckerberg, a dentist. His ancestors came from Germany, Austria and Poland. He and his three sisters, Randi, Donna, and Arielle, were brought up in Dobbs Ferry, New York, a small Westchester County village about 21 miles north of Midtown Manhattan. Zuckerberg was raised Jewish and had a Bar Mitzvah when he turned 13.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Zuckerberg
| Censored Site | Type | Alternatives |
|---|---|---|
| Microblog | Gab.ai | |
| YouTube | Video | d.tube |
| Forums | Voat.co | |
| Imgur | Images | KEK.gg |
| GitHub | Software Projects | GitGud.io |
Anyone know of a Facebook alternative?
Huh?
.
Praying for technology advancements and/or other developments or competition that add facebook to the trash bin of history.
Those are self banning
Well, they would actually, if you are familiar with the Muslim idea of NEVER portraying “the Prophet, PBUH” ,
/sarc
You bet! To most muslims depictions of the “profit” are haram. They’d burn Fakebook down within hours.
Im saying that Facebook would never ban pictures of Mohamed..but banning pictures of Jesus, figures since facebook is a leftist site
The global cabal's ATTACK on Caucasian Christian culture WORLDWIDE is evident with the Mexican INVASION of the U.S. and Muslim INVASION of Europe. All aimed at REPLACING Caucasians with other groups of people LESS LIKELY TO RESIST AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT.
Zuckerberg is a fraud. Zuckerberg is a FAKE STORE FRONT posing as an entrepreneur who is ACTUALLY the person chosen by the global cabal to perpetrate their PROFILE-BUILDING OPERATION OF EVERY HUMAN ON EARTH VIA FACEBOOK WHERE THE SUBJECTS THEMSELVES ARE TRICKED INTO GIVING THE GLOBAL CABAL ALL THEY NEED TO ESTABLISH WHETHER SAID PERSON REQUIRES FUTURE RETALIATION OR PUNISHMENT.
I thought you were being sarcastic, since muslims would go berserk over pictures of Mad Mo.
LOL!.......................
MYSPACE.............................
How so?
Muslims are offended by pictures of Muhammad.
Facebook wouldn’t want to offend Muslims.
Let's try it. I don't have a FB account.......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.