[Telepathic Intruder]

As far as I’m concerned, the public should be able to acquire and own any weapon that is used by the police, and that includes the AR-15. We know that the police themselves will not likely come to the rescue during a shooting, so who’s going to protect us? No one but ourselves.

[Sarah Barracuda]

Leftists want to repeal the 2nd Amendment so we will be easier to kill..they say it everyday..with what they constantly say about Conservatives, how we are “Dying out” they want us dead..end of story

[guitar Josh]

They say they want to ban ar-15s because weapons of war have no place on our streets. A sniper rifle is a weapon of war, and it is indistinguishable from a hunting rifle. The shotguns the military is issued is no different than the ones we can buy. The handguns they're issued are no different the ones we can own, and let's not forget that their last presidential nominee wanted to allow gun companies to be sued, which would put them out of business, and make no gun maker want to sell their products in America.

But they don't want to ban guns

[A strike]

“.. boils down to this: You didn’t hear what you thought you heard. “

You didn’t hear what you heard.

[publius911]

Anti-Gun Media: We Never Said We Wanted To Repeal The Second Amendment...Uh, Yes You Did

What is truly remarkable is that even a recent former Supreme Court Justice would flunk the most elementary test of the history of the Constitution.

Two essential questions are never asked --- or answered :

1. Can the Bill of Rights be amended or repealed?

2. Would our Constitution have been ratified and adopted without the Bill of Rights as written?

A little thought will confirm the right answers should be...

Why was the Declaration of Independence signed Aug 2, 1776 but the adoption of the Constitution took until May 29,1790? Transportation was slow back then, but not that slow! Would the Union exist today without the Bill of Rights?

The rational factual answer would make the ignorant "progressive" Dim Marxist liberal heads explode Coast to Coast.

[Billthedrill]

Media domination offered the gun prohibitionists deniability, but the crazies with the signs and the microphones have taken away plausible deniability. We saw and heard what we saw and heard, and the battle lines have been drawn. Most of us on the gun ownership side have known that for a very long time now.

It costs a very great deal of money to attack us on a state-by-state level, which is the current strategy. More important, the blithe assumption that once in place such prohibitions can never be overturned has been resoundingly shattered with the direction that concealed carry has taken nationwide and with the expiration of the AWB. Noise and media hysteria haven't carried the issue and they're not going to. And they might just kill the Dems' chances in November.

[alexander_busek]

This is all part of fever dream conservatives are suffering in the wake of the tragic Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in February; the Left has made this diagnosis through their computer screens.

Darn journalists! "... the tragic Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School what in February?"

Regards,

[Crucial]

When you have the enemy on the run you hunt them down and make them pay.

[preacher]

L8r

[trebb]

Kind of ironic they do not fear reprisal from the millions of law abiding gun owners they keep trashing....I wonder if their pea brains ever consider that....

[DuncanWaring]

and we know the end game. It is the end of the Second Amendment.

The "end game" is most of us dead, the rest in chains.

[Cboldt]

The left plays word games with this (and everything else). If the RKBA is restricted to the National Guard, or conditioned on tens of thousands of dollars in fees, or otherwise made "rare," the left will say it has NOT banned the RKBA.

Hillary OPENLY asserted she though Heller was wrongly decided and should be reversed.