Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: catnipman

Interesting article.

The company I work for has a workforce wherein fully half of them will be eligible for retirement within the next five years. There are typically a half-dozen retirement parties each week. The company isn’t forcing them out, they are leaving - in many cases careers of over 30 years (one guy had 45 years under his belt).

The company itself appeared to be largely ignorant of the accelerated rate of departure of its brain-trust - the accumulation of tribal knowledge - of its workforce. Now they’re trying desperately to identify, collect, transfer, and preserve that tribal knowledge.

I wonder if IBM even cares that they are shedding their best n brightest?


8 posted on 04/01/2018 9:08:31 AM PDT by rockrr (Everything is different now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rockrr

I wonder if IBM even cares that they are shedding their best n brightest?

____________

They didn’t care in the nineties and they don’t care now. Very poorly managed company from a value perspective.


23 posted on 04/01/2018 9:37:24 AM PDT by Chickensoup (Leftists today are speaking as if they plan to commence to commit genocide against conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr

“I wonder if IBM even cares that they are shedding their best n brightest?”

They care... about the share price. The risk analysis of losing good people is acceptable which is why they do it.


30 posted on 04/01/2018 9:47:47 AM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (What is a Blue City? First world cities run by third world politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr
I wonder if IBM even cares that they are shedding their best n brightest?

No. IBM is one of the biggest outsourcers in America. For instance, CenturyLink (real example) will outsource to them, including sending the employees for they systems outsourced to become IBM employees. This means that CenturyLink can say that they didn't fire anyone.

Once IBM gets these systems it just keeps them running, not doing a lot of enhancements or conversions. It will squeeze as much labor out of the systems as possible, because that is how they make money. The absolute fewest employees will be kept to keep the systems running.

Then after the system is at its end of life, it will turn it off and lay everyone off.

So no, it doesn't care that it is laying off people. That is the whole point of the exercise, to make their partners look good, and take responsibility for the firings themselves.

Not a year goes by anymore where IBM doesn't fire tens of thousands of employees, but they never run out of employees either.

52 posted on 04/01/2018 11:16:57 AM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: rockrr
The company itself appeared to be largely ignorant of the accelerated rate of departure of its brain-trust - the accumulation of tribal knowledge - of its workforce. Now they’re trying desperately to identify, collect, transfer, and preserve that tribal knowledge.

A friend of mine works in the elevator repair trade. They have the exact same thing going on. The company he works for is going to lose more than half its experienced folks within 10 years or less. In many cases, they don't even have someone junior working their way up. That company is fucked, because there is no way they are going to be able to even fill the slots with mouth-breathers, much less folk who know what they are doing.

79 posted on 04/02/2018 7:24:25 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson