Posted on 03/30/2018 8:20:14 PM PDT by Innovative
Two reasons could explain Laura Ingraham's decision to mock Parkland shooting survivor David Hogg for his college rejections. One is schadenfreude, but it is seems overly cynical to think that the Fox News host takes pleasure in watching more bad things happen to a teenager who lost 14 schoolmates and three educators last month.
The other, more plausible reason is that Ingraham wants to remove Hogg from a national conversation about gun control. Rather than debate him, she would prefer to disqualify him.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
That is so right on it’s ridiculous. A simple truth the idiot so-called “conservatives” never seem to grasp.
David Hogg was not in school the day of the shooting when he heard about it he hopped on his bike with his mobile device an when he got there he started filming he has not shut up since. Using that parameter i am also a PARKLAND survivor in that I was not at that location. I hate it when liberals move into a disaster like this an squeeze all the air out of news feeds screw u david hogg i hope no college every accepts u just go to work of CNN or PMSNBC.
Freegards LEX
Soros is behind this.
EXACTLY
He didn’t lose anything or anyone. This sentence is ridiculous and embarrassing.
Why is a 19 year old still in high school?
When did he and Kasky enroll at Parkland HS?
((ahem)) Isn't that Standard Operating Procedure for liberals? Maybe that's why it was so easy for them to spot it.
No point in putting herself in a position Hogg can put his face in front of hers, and yell, and scream liberal baloney, because the MSM will of course favor him, as well go after her for child abuse for arguing with him.
The best way to handle this is for her to just go on, ignoring the incident.
Stupid article. *I* will debate Hogg. So with many others on here.
It’s hard for a sane person to debate a budding leftist psychopath.
Make an example of all of them. Make them never want to use kids as human shields ever again.
In some cases, the journalist apologized. Why wasn’t that enough?
“You never apologize to a mob. You’re not dealing with individuals who you can reestablish a relationship with. You’re dealing with a soulless idea that has people in its possession. And it’s a shifting entity, it doesn’t even involve the same people necessarily across time although there’s often a core, and all the idea is going to do with your apology is note that you believe that the game is fair, the game that they foisted on you is fair and that you’re guilty of breaking the rules.”
How can she debate him? Anything she’s says will be used against her by the left and the MSM. That little Hitler can say anything he wants. And she is not allowed to say crap.
Preaching to the choir FRiend. I’m a former Leftie. Been telling conservatives there’s no playing nice with the Left. They see civility as weakness. Violence is the stock in trade of the Left. They should always be paid back in their own coin. It’s all the understand. Typically when you do paste them a good one they fold like a cheap suit.
Jon Levine Verified Account
@LevineJonathan
BREAKING: Laura Ingraham announced on tonight’s show that she would take next week off and be replaced by “a great lineup of guest hosts”
https://mobile.twitter.com/LevineJonathan/status/979923018150445056?p=v
Not to hard to figure out what that is about.
See post #36. And that is a verified twitter account.
Jordan Peterson is fantastic. I’ve seen him quite a bit on Fox News lately. Specifically on Tucker Carlson’s show and Gregg Gutfeld’s Saturday night show.
Yup.
>> Anything she’s says will be used against her by the left and the MSM.
Yes, and the MSM is Disney, Comcast, and CNN.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.