Whoraldo mad a big deal out of him being white and Austin being a sanctuary city. Clearly the bomber was a racist who was against Austin’s policy.
Picture of him on Drudge, don’t match with picture at Fed Ex. Look at his arms at Fed Ex vs Pic on Drudge.
Can we expect a manifesto tailor made for that narrative?
A lone bomber targeting random locations with what authorities called sophisticated devices is I would think in the forensics of crime an anomaly.
Bomb making is dangerous. I doubt you can just read a “How to blow things up for the advanced bomber” book gather your materials and one week later be spreading carnage.
Bombers usually are rather clear about their motives. Political, monetary (as in extortion), personal or all three. I think spreading the fear is part of why bombers choose that method of murder. Even if not announced in advance the choice of target is usually an obvious one meant to make clear the “power” of the bomber and the vulnerability of the victims.
I am not writing the suspect was not the guilty party(as in delivered the bombs) but I wonder whether he was truly working alone. Whether he was the one who made the bombs. If not who did and did they decide the suspect would be the fall guy for the bombings. I also find it rather convenient that this crime was solved so early when compared to others of its type.
I am almost scared to write this but it is almost as though the bombings were a trial run. Which does not speak to a lone bomber scenario.