Posted on 03/20/2018 12:45:38 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Polygraph tests taken in 2011 by Stormy Daniels and her ex-husband Michael Mosney support Daniels accounts that she had unprotected sex with President Trump in July 2006, according to a report Tuesday.
A polygraph examiner specifically asked Daniels in 2011 if she had "unprotected sex" with Trump in July of 2006. According to records published by the Wall Street Journal, Daniels was truthful when she answered "yes."
Before taking the lie-detector test in 2011, Life & Style Magazine allegedly offered Clifford $15,000 to share the story about her affair with Trump after Daniel's agent reached out to them, the WSJ reports. After interviewing and taking the polygraph, the magazine contacted Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen to request a comment.
Cohen reportedly threatened to sue the magazine and Life & Style decided not to publish the story.
Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 in hush money so she would not discuss her alleged relationship with Trump. Daniels signed a nondisclosure agreement in 2016, but Daniels filed a lawsuit this month calling for it to be nullified because Trump failed to sign it.
Daniel's lawyer, Michael Avenatti, did not extensively comment on Daniel's attempted to sell the story of her affair with Trump in 2011.
“Unfortunately, and despite the prior WSJ reporting which was credible, this story is far more fiction than fact. Too many inaccuracies to count,” Avenatti said in a written statement, according to The Wall Street Journal.
The Stormy Daniels threads over at DU are a hoot! They don’t personally care that Trump had an affair with a porn star but they can’t understand why conservative Christians aren’t outraged about it and loudly condemning him!
That is different. Bath house Barry’s protectors, kill, or threaten to kil,l people who tell the truth on Barry.
One psychology instructor spoke a lot about the shortcomings of polygraph machines.
May I be about the 50 millionth person to say “who cares”?
This is between him and his wife. It has nothing to do with anything in the real world.
Couldn’t pass an NDA tho. Or an STD test.
I don’t understand what the big deal is some of the prior President were banging someone, sheesh.
“Can a pathological liar pass the test?”
It’s a known fact.
That and the proverbial thumbtack in your shoe.
LIE DETECTOR QUESTIONS:
1. Have you ever seen Mr. Trump on TV?
2. Would you like to make a lot of $$$?
3. Can you tell a lie with a straight face?
Then like the weather you changed.........Oh Stormy! Oh Stormy! bring back that sunnnny day.
Then go to hell, slut.
This is one reason that angers the left so much. A great Alinsky tactic is not working anymore. That is great!
The problem with the left is that once people catch on to your tactics, they don’t work anymore.
Hillary is still livid about that. Can’t believe it. It was all supposed to work!
Did Trump commit adultery in the White House just as those great Democrat icons FDR, JFK, LBJ and Bubba did?
RE: I’m still trying to figure out how this is relevant to anyone besides his wife.
It’s not, but there is a method to this madness, see Post #8 above as one of the goals.
And Im supposed to care about who Trump banged back in the day why??? Gee can the same media do a lie detector test on the guy who claimed to have had a homosexual relationship with Barack Obama..Id love to see those results
so, a woman who has sex for money now wants to make more money from the same supposed sex. talk about double dipping.
I also say so what. We learned from the Dems that an affair has no bearing on a man’s ability to do his job and that it isn’t important to the public. Now all of the sudden it is? That’s Dems for you.
Lie detector tests are just electronic witch craft.
I took one in the late 70’s as part of a job interview; they asked me if I had a valid drivers license, I said yes, the machine said I lied.
Had it in my wallet and offered to show it, they told me the machine is never wrong.
Needless to say, I didn’t get the job.
I bet Juanita Broderick could pass a lie detector about Clinton raping her.
Everyone should also know that this was part of Paula Jone’s problem with Clinton in the 90s:
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/990/
The famous Rat lawyers Akhil Amar and Neal Katyal make a strong claim for Presidential immunity while in office.
Be fun to watch the Rats try to argue the opposite now.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.