Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vanders9
"Of course, the pinko commentators are trying to do some damage limitation by deflection or questioning the evidence"

Yes, God forbid you ever do anything unreasonable like that. Question the evidence? Why that would be almost the same as showing a lack of faith in your government, wouldn't it?

Brits. The original sheep.
13 posted on 03/19/2018 3:43:39 PM PDT by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Garth Tater
So let me get this straight. The BBC is unreliable because it is funded by the British government,except when it tries to cover for the attempted murder of two Russian defectors with a nerve toxin developed and deployed by the Russians? The cynical might conclude you think questioning the evidence is ok then because it accords with your own preconcieved prejudices. And you call US sheep?

Look I know there is a section of the hell-yeah Yankee-doodle neoliberal Mothers apple pie brigade who like to stick their tongues up Vladamir Putin's a$$ because he happens to be fighting against the new American boogeyman ISIS, but the simple fact is he's fighting the Muslims for HIS benefit, not yours. The man is still an autocratic dictator who plays upon the fears of the Russian populace to keep himself in power. And nothing plays upon fears more than this kind of thing.

Either the Russians carried out this hit, or some of their Agents have gone rogue and carried out this hit, or someone they have sold or given this stuff to has carried out the hit, or they've lost or had it stolen by someone. In any of those eventualities, they have some questions to answer.

19 posted on 03/23/2018 9:00:24 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson