I don’t see any benefit in expressing my point of view on those questions, here. I see the questions as posed in bad faith, and nothing you say will convince me otherwise.
You see my questions as being "posed in bad faith", because you can't answer them without forcing yourself to admit the obvious logical conclusion, which is:
Knowing that he could not ethically go after the Clinton Crime Syndicate, Jeff Sessions should have immediately withdrawn his name from contention to be nominated as AG. To do otherwise would open the door to installing a crippled AG, who would be legally handcuffed, and barred from spearheading the absolutely vital investigations into what is without doubt, the most egregious episode of government corruption in our nation's history.
By recusing himself from this most urgent task, then remaining in the office, he has effectively shielded all of the major players from justice, while holding the door open for those selfsame traitors to mount a palace coup against his president.
Jeff Sessions, through his feckless cowardice, has aided and abetted one of the most diabolical plots in American history.