Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76
Gregg Jarrett was not helpful in that segment. He did not cite "the right law" (or the right regulation, for the pedantic).

The prevailing belief is that Sessions recused from investigating anything that had to do with Russia, or some such nonsense. But by the simple act of actually reading the public recusal notice, in combination with the regulation cited, one would learn that Sessions recused from investigating the Trump campaign, because he was an adviser to it.

Before that, in his confirmation hearings, he told Grassley that he would recuse from investigating Hillary and the Clinton Foundation, because his public statements suggest he is biased against them.

27 posted on 03/14/2018 7:52:30 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Cboldt

“...because his public statements suggest he is biased against them.”

Yep, Sessions is Mr. Purity. Recuses himself and turns the investigation over to, exclusively, Obama and Clinton loyalists. Their monetary contributions to Clinton and Obama are so much less than mere public statements.


43 posted on 03/14/2018 8:05:10 PM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
...in his confirmation hearings, he told Grassley that he would recuse from investigating Hillary and the Clinton Foundation, because his public statements suggest he is biased against them.

Fair enough, but why didn't Sessions immediately resign, upon realizing that he couldn't ethically go after the Clinton Crime Syndicate?

Why did he park himself in the position of AG while in such a neutered state, thus preventing the President from quickly choosing an alternate pick who COULD be effective?

83 posted on 03/14/2018 8:40:36 PM PDT by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Cboldt
Gregg Jarrett was not helpful in that segment. He did not cite "the right law" (or the right regulation, for the pedantic).

The prevailing belief is that Sessions recused from investigating anything that had to do with Russia, or some such nonsense. But by the simple act of actually reading the public recusal notice, in combination with the regulation cited, one would learn that Sessions recused from investigating the Trump campaign, because he was an adviser to it.

Before that, in his confirmation hearings, he told Grassley that he would recuse from investigating Hillary and the Clinton Foundation, because his public statements suggest he is biased against them.

Thanks for the wisdom.

174 posted on 03/15/2018 4:48:55 AM PDT by a little elbow grease (Zip ties and duct tape are far more productive than pussy hats and #metoo tweets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson