And my point is that they are not trained to be armed guards. And as a group as a whole, they don’t even do the job they are supposedly trained for very well, when you see the dismal results from the public schools. They already are not handling whats on their plate very well, they should not be given weapons and dumping more onto their plates.
Wat should be done is end schools as gun free zones, and whoever wants to carry, can carry.
>>And my point is that they are not trained to be armed guards<<
And my point is the following:
Persons who are fully trained in the use of guns and who are psychologically capable of confronting and killing armed assailants need to be on duty in all schools, no exceptions. And anyone, regardless of their current or previous profession, who is both qualified and willing to perform this service to protect the students and school personnel in our country’s schools should be assigned to do so.
Since you obviously disagree, tell us just how you would recommend that the next psycho with access to firearms is to be prevented from slaughtering children in school. Go ahead, take your time and give it some thought.
>>Wat should be done is end schools as gun free zones, and whoever wants to carry, can carry.<<
The second part of this statement contradicts your previous one about not having teachers armed. Make up your mind.