Replies

Then you explain to me why the police send upwards of 50 people in response to these types of situations.

Some folks have determined it only takes on guy.

Let me know when you find one instance where only one officer was sent out to end this type of a situation.

I don’t give a rat’s ass what these motor-mouths say.

Their grand police department didn’t even bother to make sure this guy was taken care off the 30 times they were called out on him.

Now it the security guy’s fault?

LOL

Folks seriously...

Their grand police department didn’t even bother to make sure this guy was taken care off the 30 times they were called out on him.
#####################

Spot on. The Sheriff deeds to be replaced.

I haven't been on in a while and i guess I should not say any thing but you seem to be stepping hard a on some people saying how stupid they are that they expected the policeman to do something more than he done that they had no right to expect him to place his life in danger that he might get killed.

You also said if the guy was 30 ft away he wouldn't have much of a chance of hitting him with his handgun.

Well I should not say anything; but the more you post the harder you come down on people which seems a little off for you and I;ll try to take a little heat off the others.

To say the officer has no obligation to place himself in a situation where he may get in a gun fight is not really right.

He knowingly chose a job that was very good chance that it could happen and was certainly one of the risks might have to take.

This is like those people who sign up for our volunteer military in the past during peace time to see the world dress up like a real soldier and then screaming their heads when a conflict breaks out and bullets start flying saying this ain't fair didn't sign up for this.

Also you imply that he would be committing suicide to have to go in the building because the guy would have seen him and if he could not get closer than thirty feet he would have little chance of hitting him or doing any good.

Yes the guy with the rifle most of the time has the advantage over the guy with the handgun but not always.

If you think that a .45 auto, 357 .44 or.45 revolver are not capable against a man size target at ranges of fifty to a hundred yards with standard iron sights then you haven't done much shooting or been trained around men who can really shoot.

I mean come on, most clubs and private ranges have the old 100yd gong and some years before these wonderful computer lathes and ugly but light plastic marvels, I have seen guys pull out their little Beretta .25's and Colt 380's auto backup and 2".38's and play Johnnie Come Marching Home in b flat. Lets not forget this officer was a veteran police officer and this was an untrained 19 coward proved by the targets he chose and he didn't expect any one to show up very quickly and with all the running and screaming and him shooting he was focusing on them and this should have able to tell from the shots and yells where he was located and to approached without being surprised.

I guess what really bothered me was I believe was thinking about his retirement and the money.

I mean he tried to say he done what he thought was best and I might have given him benefit of the doubt I usually do to most people, especially our policemen my Dad was one for a number of years and my brother and nephew were firemen and retired from them.

But this guy had no intention to stand by his statement but resigned as quickly as he could after his statement.

He ran before any thing could be looked into to see if he acted inan appropriate manner.

If he stayed and it was found that he did not do his job if fired he could lose probably half of his retirement even more if it was a serious breech.

So he did not even wait to see if he would be even investigated but resigned and locked in his 75% of his eighty thousand a year retirement.

As Quick as it happened he had to be in process or finished before his speech.

We seen what happened when a real police approached him with no cover with his weapon in this little monsters face he stuck his nose in the dirt.

I'm not trying to make this guy the scapegoat but there is a load of that to be wrapped around the FBI and local police who needs to be where they were at the beginning reduced unarmed and behind a desk doing lab and paper work to support the states police organizations.

Since the 1960's most of what they and the CIA seem to do is spy on Americans for the democrat and republican election committees , refuse to cooperate with each while trying to get the biggest chunk of the budget money and to bust the whistle blowers and cover up the crimes that they expose committed by our politicians.

Hell, an average concealed carry person would have found a personal moral obligation to go in and address the shooter. I guess you are unaware of the countless times average citizens grab or draw their firearms in defense of a situation... they never... I mean never... just get on the damn phone and set up a a freakin’ perimeter. What a disgrace!

“Their grand police department didn’t even bother to make sure this guy was taken care off the 30 times they were called out on him.”

There’s been a few articles posted about Obama DOJ policies to reduce “at risk” high schoolers arrest rates. Having local police refer the “matters” to school administrators instead. Miami-Dade and Broward counties seemingly had adopted that policy.

Now the left is pushing back on having actual law enforcement security over fear minority kids would be sent to jail.