Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

I don’t believe Anita Hill. And it’s not because Thomas is a great Supreme Court Justice (he is). Nor is it because Hill is a moonbat (she is). It’s because it’s her word against his and there is a presumption of innocence in the absence of strong evidence. In this case it’s just not there. Normally (and I concede there are exceptions) when a man is a sex addict or engages in the kind of behavior that we would label as sexual harassment, it is a pattern of behavior. It is very rarely limited to one victim and there is almost always corroborating evidence in the form of other victims or witnesses. None of that exists here. Further if that was in his character he would not have been able to suppress it all these years he has been on the High Court. This would have come up again. But it hasn’t.

And just so as not to be accused of hypocrisy, I try to follow the same standards neutrally as much as possible which sometimes has been inconvenient as a Conservative. The same standard of proof lead me to the unhappy conclusion that Roy Moore probably was guilty of at least some inappropriate behavior. Way too many corroborating witnesses. I could never buy the conspiracy claims of his defenders.


7 posted on 02/21/2018 2:23:54 PM PST by NRx (A man of integrity passes his father's civilization to his son, without selling it off to strangers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NRx
Good post, but I disagree with one point about Roy Moore.

I don't believe there were any "corroborating witnesses" at all -- at least for the most serious allegations. A person who supports another person's story but didn't actually see anything isn't even a witness at all -- let alone a "corroborating" one.

8 posted on 02/21/2018 2:29:20 PM PST by Alberta's Child ("Go ahead, bite the Big Apple ... don't mind the maggots.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: NRx
B.S. FLAG on your "the unhappy conclusion that Roy Moore probably was guilty of at least some inappropriate behavior.".
JUDGE Royt Moore was wiped out by "FRACTION MAGIC".

When do running vote totals go DOWN on live T.V. reporting ? Watch the LIVE VOTE RETURNS.
IF THE LIVE VOTE COUNT TOTALS START GOING DOWN, YOU KNOW "FRACTION MAGIC" IS BEING USED !

DemocRATS will NEVER leave elections in the hands of the voters again, after Trump won !

STEALING ELECTIONS WITH COMPUTERS and Technology Cybercrimes, watch Bloomberg's Digital Defense November 3, 2016 (19:40).

To better understand "THE MASTER KEY" to stealing elections with computers, watch:
I'LL NEVER TRUST ANOTHER COMPUTER COUNTED ELECTION AGAIN !

Things have changed!

Bennie Smith, a Memphis computer programmer, discovered HOW this is done through aDiebold Election Systems changed its name in 2006 to Premier Election Solutions.
Bloomberg's article titled How to Protect Against Election Day Hacking gives more proof of this by Memphis computer programmer Bennie Smith.
9 posted on 02/21/2018 2:38:25 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson